Mini Edition by Joseph Harris. Common Sense Comments.

Home
About Mini Edition
Speaking Schedule
Books
Brother Ritechus N Dignation
Contact/Subscribe
Archives
Patriotism
Politics & Religion
Personal Responsibility
Family, Education
Abortion
Links

Attention Mini Edition Subscribers by Email:  I have lost all email addresses for subscribers and have no way of retrieving them or contacting subscribers.  If you are a subscriber, this is the reason you have not received Mini Edition lately.  If you would like to subscribe again, please send your email address to me at joharris@comcast.net and I will add your address.  If you know of any other subscribers, please relay this message to them. 

To subscribe to Mini Edition, send an email to joharris@comcast.net with ADD in the subject line.

harrisjoseph.jpg

 June 9, 2009                             Number 215      
                                                                                                                         
     The following is an excerpt from a title originally published as "The Life of Colonel David Crockett,"  by Edward Sylvester Ellis.  These words have been reprinted many times in the past century and have been circulated over the internet for the past few years.  It is a sobering article and much needed today as it is a staunch reminder of the limited responsibility of government and who the money appropriated by the government actually belongs to.  I strongly urge you to read it and pass it on.  The truth, simplicity and clarity of the following words will make an honest person think.  I will go out on a limb and say that some will never view government spending the same after this reading.  It is lengthy, but well worth the time of any true patriot who is concerned about America in these days of the Marxinization (I love coining new words) of this country. - Joseph Harris -

                               Not Yours To Give
 Col. David Crockett  US Representative from Tennessee

One day in the House of Representatives a bill was taken up appropriating money for the benefit of a widow of a distinguished naval officer. Several beautiful speeches had been made in its support. The Speaker was just about to put the question when Crockett arose:

"Mr. Speaker--I have as much respect for the memory of the deceased, and as much sympathy for the sufferings of the living, if suffering there be, as any man in this House, but we must not permit our respect for the dead or our sympathy for a part of the living to lead us into an act of injustice to the balance of the living. I will not go into an argument to prove that Congress has not the power to appropriate this money as an act of charity. Every member upon this floor knows it. We have the right, as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right so to appropriate a dollar of the public money. Some eloquent appeals have been made to us upon the ground that it is a debt due the deceased. Mr. Speaker, the deceased lived long after the close of the war; he was in office to the day of his death, and I have never heard that the government was in arrears to him.

"Every man in this House knows it is not a debt. We cannot, without the grossest corruption, appropriate this money as the payment of a debt. We have not the semblance of authority to appropriate it as charity. Mr. Speaker, I have said we have the right to give as much money of our own as we please. I am the poorest man on this floor. I cannot vote for this bill, but I will give one week's pay to the object, and if every member of Congress will do the same, it will amount to more than the bill asks."

He took his seat. Nobody replied. The bill was put upon its passage, and, instead of passing unanimously, as was generally supposed, and as, no doubt, it would, but for that speech, it received but few votes, and, of course, was lost.

Later, when asked by a friend why he had opposed the appropriation, Crockett gave this explanation:

"Several years ago I was one evening standing on the steps of the Capitol with some other members of Congress, when our attention was attracted by a great light over in Georgetown. It was evidently a large fire. We jumped into a hack and drove over as fast as we could. In spite of all that could be done, many houses were burned and many families made houseless, and, besides, some of them had lost all but the clothes they had on. The weather was very cold, and when I saw so many women and children suffering, I felt that something ought to be done for them. The next morning a bill was introduced appropriating $20,000 for their relief. We put aside all other business and rushed it through as soon as it could be done.

"The next summer, when it began to be time to think about election, I concluded I would take a scout around among the boys of my district. I had no opposition there, but, as the election was some time off, I did not know what might turn up. When riding one day in a part of my district in which I was more of a stranger than any other, I saw a man in a field plowing and coming toward the road. I gauged my gait so that we should meet as he came to the fence. As he came up, I spoke to the man. He replied politely, but, as I thought, rather coldly.

"I began: 'Well, friend, I am one of those unfortunate beings called
candidates, and---‘


"Yes I know you; you are Colonel Crockett. I have seen you once before, and voted for you the last time you were elected. I suppose you are out electioneering now, but you had better not waste your time or mine, I shall not vote for you again."

"This was a sockdolager...I begged him to tell me what was the matter.

" ’Well, Colonel, it is hardly worth-while to waste time or words upon it. I do not see how it can be mended, but you gave a vote last winter which shows that either you have not capacity to understand the Constitution, or that you are wanting in the honesty and firmness to be guided by it. In either case you are not the man to represent me. But I beg your pardon for expressing it in that way. I did not intend to avail myself of the privilege of the constituent to speak plainly to a candidate for the purpose of insulting or wounding you. I intend by it only to say that your understanding of the Constitution is very different from mine; and I will say to you what, but for my rudeness, I should not have said, that I believe you to be honest.
But an understanding of the C
onstitution different from mine I cannot overlook, because the Constitution, to be worth anything, must be held sacred, and rigidly observed in all its provisions. The man who wields power and misinterprets it is the more dangerous the more honest he is.'

" 'I admit the truth of all you say, but there must be some mistake about it, for I do not remember that I gave any vote last winter upon any constitutional question.’

“ ‘No, Colonel, there’s no mistake. Though I live in the backwoods and seldom go from home, I take the papers from Washington and read very carefully all the proceedings of Congress. My papers say that last winter you voted for a bill to appropriate $20,000 to some sufferers by a fire in Georgetown. Is that true?’

"
‘Well, my friend; I may as well own up. You have got me there. But certainly nobody will complain that a great and rich country like ours should give the insignificant sum of $20,000 to relieve its suffering women and children, particularly with a full and overflowing Treasury, and I am sure, if you had been there, you would have done just as I did.'

" ‘
It is not the amount, Colonel, that I complain of; it is the principle. In the first place, the government ought to have in the Treasury no more than enough for its legitimate purposes. But that has nothing with the question. The power of collecting and disbursing money at pleasure is the most dangerous power that can be entrusted to man, particularly under our system of collecting revenue by a tariff, which reaches every man in the country, no matter how poor he may be, and the poorer he is the more he pays in proportion to his means. What is worse, it presses upon him without his knowledge where the weight centers, for there is not a man in the United States who can ever guess how much he pays to the government. So you see, that while you are contributing to relieve one, you are drawing it from thousands who are even worse off than he. If you had the right to give anything, the amount was simply a matter of discretion with you, and you had as much right to give $20,000,000 as $20,000. If you have the right to give to one, you have the right to give to all; and, as the Constitution neither defines charity nor stipulates the amount, you are at liberty to give to any and everything which you may believe, or profess to believe, is a charity, and to any amount you may think proper. You will very easily perceive what a wide door this would open for fraud and corruption and favoritism, on the one hand, and for robbing the people on the other. 'No, Colonel, Congress has no right to give charity. Individual members may give as much of their own money as they please, but they have no right to touch a dollar of the public money for that purpose. If twice as many houses had been burned in this county as in Georgetown, neither you nor any other member of Congress would have thought of appropriating a dollar for our relief. There are about two hundred and forty members of Congress. If they had shown their sympathy for the sufferers by contributing each one week's pay, it would have made over $13,000. There are plenty of wealthy men in and around Washington who could have given $20,000 without depriving themselves of even a luxury of life.' "The congressmen chose to keep their own money, which, if reports be true, some of them spend not very creditably; and the people about Washington, no doubt, applauded you for relieving them from the necessity of giving by giving what was not yours to give. The people have delegated to Congress, by the Constitution, the power to do certain things. To do these, it is authorized to collect and pay moneys, and for nothing else. Everything beyond this is usurpation, and a violation of the Constitution.'


" 'So you see, Colonel, you have violated the Constitution in what I consider a vital point. It is a precedent fraught with danger to the country, for when Congress once begins to stretch its power beyond the limits of the Constitution, there is no limit to it, and no security for the people. I have no doubt you acted honestly, but that does not make it any better, except as far as you are personally concerned, and you see that I cannot vote for you.'

"I tell you I felt streaked. I saw if I should have opposition, and this man should go to talking, he would set others to talking, and in that district I was a gone fawn-skin. I could not answer him, and the fact is, I was so fully convinced that he was right, I did not want to. But I must satisfy him, and I said to him:

"
Well, my friend, you hit the nail upon the head when you said I had not sense enough to understand the Constitution. I intended to be guided by it, and thought I had studied it fully. I have heard many speeches in Congress about the powers of Congress, but what you have said here at your plow has got more hard, sound sense in it than all the fine speeches I ever heard. If I had ever taken the view of it that you have, I would have put my head into the fire before I would have given that vote; and if you will forgive me and vote for me again, if I ever vote for another unconstitutional law I wish I may be shot.'

"He laughingly replied; 'Yes, Colonel, you have sworn to that once before, but I will trust you again upon one condition. You say that you
are convinced that your vote was wrong. Your acknowledgment of it will do more good than beating you for it. If, as you go around the district, you will tell people about this vote, and that you are satisfied it was wrong, I will not only vote for you, but will do what I can to keep down opposition, and,
perhaps, I may exert some little influence in that way.'

" ‘
If I don't’
, said I, 'I wish I may be shot; and to convince you that I am in earnest in what I say I will come back this way in a week or ten days, and if you will get up a gathering of the people, I will make a speech to them. Get up a barbecue, and I will pay for it.'

" ‘
No, Colonel, we are not rich people in this section, but we have plenty of provisions to contribute for a barbecue, and some to spare for those who have none. The push of crops will be over in a few days, and we can then afford a day for a barbecue. This is Thursday; I will see to getting it up on Saturday week. Come to my house on Friday, and we will go together, and I promise you a very respectable crowd to see and hear you.’


" 'Well
, I will be here. But one thing more before I say good-bye. I must know your name.’

" 'My name is Bunce.'

" 'Not Horatio Bunce?'

" 'Yes
.’


" 'Well, Mr. Bunce, I never saw you before, though you say you have seen me, but I know you very well. I am glad I have met you, and very proud that I may hope to have you for my friend.'

"It was one of the luckiest hits of my life that I met him. He mingled but little with the public, but was widely known for his remarkable intelligence and incorruptible integrity,  and for a heart brimful and running over with kindness and benevolence, which showed themselves not only in words but in acts. He was the oracle of the whole country around him, and his fame had extended far beyond the circle of his immediate acquaintance. Though I had never met him
,
before, I had heard much of him, and but for this meeting it is very likely I should have had opposition, and had been beaten. One thing is very certain, no man could now stand up in that district under such a vote.

"At the appointed time I was at his house, having told our conversation to every crowd I had met, and to every man I stayed all night with, and I found that it gave the people an interest and a confidence in me stronger than I had ever seen manifested before.

"Though I was considerably fatigued when I reached his house, and, under ordinary circumstances, should have gone early to bed, I kept him up until midnight,
talking about the principles and affairs of government, and got more real, true knowledge of them than I had got all my life before.

"I have known and seen much of him since, for I respect him - no, that is not the word - I reverence and love him more than any living man, and I go to see him two or three times every year; and I will tell you, sir, if every one who professes to be a Christian lived and acted and enjoyed it as he does, the religion of Christ would take the world by storm.

"But to return to my story. The next morning we went to the barbecue,
and, to my surprise, found about a thousand men there. I met a good many whom I had not known before, and they and my friend introduced me around until I had got pretty well acquainted - at least, they all knew me.

"In due time notice was given that I would speak to them. They gathered up around a stand that had been erected. I opened my speech by saying:

" ‘
Fellow-citizens - I present myself before you today feeling like a new man. My eyes have lately been opened to truths which ignorance or prejudice, or both, had heretofore hidden from my view. I feel that I can today offer you the ability to render you more valuable service than I have ever been able to render before. I am here today more for the purpose of acknowledging my error than to seek your votes. That I should make this acknowledgment is due to myself as well as to you. Whether you will vote for me is a matter for your consideration only.’"


"I went on to tell them about the fire and my vote for the appropriation and then told them why I was satisfied it was wrong. I closed by saying:

"
And now, fellow-citizens, it remains only for me to tell you that the most of the speech you have listened to with so much interest was simply a repetition of the arguments by which your neighbor, Mr. Bunce, convinced me of my error.

" ‘
It is the best speech I ever made in my life, but he is entitled to the
credit for it. And now I hope he is satisfied with his convert and that he will get up here and tell you so.'

"He came upon the stand and said:

" ‘
Fellow-citizens - I
t affords me great pleasure to comply with the request of Colonel Crockett. I have always considered him a thoroughly honest man, and I am satisfied that he will faithfully perform all that he has promised you today.'

"He went down, and there went up from that crowd such a shout for Davy Crockett as his name never called forth before.
'

"I am not much given to tears, but I was taken with a choking then and felt some big drops rolling down my cheeks. And I tell you now that the remembrance of those few words spoken by such a man, and the honest, hearty shout they produced, is worth more to me than all the honors I have received and all the reputation I have ever made, or ever shall make, as a member of Congress.'


"Now, sir," concluded Crockett, "you know why I made that speech yesterday.

"There is one thing now to which I will call your attention.
You remember that I proposed to give a week's pay. There are in that House many very wealthy men - men who think nothing of spending a week's pay, or a dozen of them, for a dinner or a wine party when they have something to accomplish by it. Some of those same men made beautiful speeches upon the great debt of gratitude which the country owed the deceased--a debt which could not be paid by money--and the insignificance and worthlessness of money, particularly so insignificant a sum as $10,000,  when weighed against the honor of the nation. Yet not one of them responded to my proposition. Money with them is nothing but trash when it is to come out of the people. But it is the one great thing for which most of them are striving, and many of them sacrifice honor, integrity, and justice to obtain it."

Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS.

 

June 4, 2009                      Number 214      
                                                                                                The Impossibility of Same Sex Marriage

Some things just can't be changed. In the areas of nature and science, fire is hot and ice is cold. Wind always blows and the sun always produces heat.   The aforementioned facts are not up for discussion or debate. Facts are facts. There is no movement underway to "redefine" or "better understand" these facts. They are accepted because they have been proven to be true.

With the advent of the destruction of absolute authority in society (which followed the discrediting of the Bible), has also come a redefining of many things. For instance, gender is up for debate. Several years ago, a "Christian" college offered three types of housing to its students: male, female and transgendered housing. This special housing was for those students who were not sure of their gender. Huhhhh! Without being crass or too improper, there is a real easy way to find out. The answer is so common sense, it does not even need mentioning. 

The definition of murder was changed years ago when it began to be called by new names such as "choice", "abortion", "birth control" and "freedom", to name a few. With this change, came the  questioning of life beginning at conception, which used to not even be an issue,  but an accepted truth.

There are many absolutes in life. Here are some more: (1)Death is the absence of life, (2)a fertile sperm and egg are required to begin a new life and (3) Politicians, both Democrat and Republican, will always raise taxes, if given one tenth of a percent of an opportunity.   The statement, "Fire is not hot" will not change the fact that you will get fried if you jump into it.

The union of two males or two females may in fact be a union, but brother, it ain't a marriage and no amount of name changing, redefining, "compassion" or tolerance will change the truth. And speaking of civil unions, they should not even be allowed. A civil union for "domestic partners" is a mockery of marriage and an endorsement of fornication and perversity by "legally" allowing two individuals of the same sex to live together and potentially receive some of the benefits reserved for marriage.

If every federal, state and local court in the land declare that a homosexual union is a marriage, it still will not be a marriage. There are certain qualifying factors required for a couple to be married, but the foundational requirement of marriage, apart from a government license, is a requirement that is moral and common sense: that the candidates be of the opposite sex.

The continued push for perversion is not just an attack on marriage. It is an attack on God, the creator of marriage. Nevertheless, you better get ready. Buckle up tight. This abomination is coming soon to a town near you via New Hampshire.

Once again, I end this Mini Edition with another limerick from my newly written collection of Politically Incorrect Limericks (and soon to be illustrated and published):

Common Sense Sex

When your time has come for a mate

And you go out to look for a date

God made Adam and Eve

Not Adam and Steve

Common sense will help keep you straight.

Truth is truth and you can do one of two things with it: (1) Accept it  or (2) Reject it….. but you cannot change it.

Cold Hard Fact: If Adam and Steve had been the first couple in the Garden of Eden, none of us would be here today.  

                            
  Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).   
 
 
May 21, 2009                Number 213

THE PRIVILEGE OF FREEDOM                 

 (A Fourth of July Tribute)

Even though July 4 is still six weeks away, here are my pre-Independence Day thoughts about freedom. Freedom is not free. Liberty is one of the most misunderstood and least appreciated privileges enjoyed today. The desire for liberty is built into every man by God, the Creator of man. Men desire to be free from oppression and exercise volition for self-determination, and pursuit of this desire has led to the death of many men, women, and children,  who chose to take risks and seek liberty rather than remain in bondage.

Freedom is what America represents and is the main reason she is hated and despised by those who seek to enslave people religiously and politically. Freedom may appear to be “free” to its recipients, but rest assured, when freedom is obtained, someone, somewhere paid a price.

Freedom is often the result of bondage. In order to have the freedom to purchase services and products, one must first be in bondage to employment, in order to obtain money. The bondage of a 9-5 job (or any other hours) secures money,  which gives the freedom to purchase. Even if someone purchases merchandise with money received as a gift or a grant, someone, somewhere provided that money through their bondage of commitment to produce through their labor.

Even the freedom for a pianist to perform comes after the bondage of lessons and practice. It is only after paying the price of study and practice,  that the freedom to perform becomes a reality. Try playing a musical instrument with no lessons or practice and you will get the point. Men and women are free to have sexual intimacy with one another, but only after the commitment (some would say bondage) of marriage has been made. Marriage is a type of bondage, however, because a husband and wife promise to be bound exclusively to one another, hence this bondage produces the freedom for intimacy with one another. “Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge,” Hebrews 13:4.

Not only must a price be paid to secure freedom, but there is also a maintenance fee. Freedom costs, continually. The recipients of freedom must ever be aware of those who would steal liberty under the guise of promising “more freedom for all” by playing on emotions and using “ discrimination and inequality” as a battle cry.   The erroneously named American Civil Liberties Union and other groups, promote an unlimited, one sided  freedom for abortionists, pornographers, pedophiles, homosexuals and other trans-sexual deviants, while trampling on the freedom of normal Americans, especially conservative Christians. These groups must be confronted, yet believers in God must walk the tightrope of being active yet never becoming activists to the point of promoting morality above the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The priority of the pulpit is to preach the gospel, however, if ungodliness is free to reign, eventually all freedoms will be destroyed, and bondage to sin, Satan, and ungodly government will result.

The greatest freedom in the world is liberty from sin and freedom from eternal punishment in the lake of fire, through eternal salvation, but notice the paradox of price this FREEDOM required. It was secured by the payment of the Son of God on Calvary with the highest price ever paid for any purchase. We only have freedom through Christ by first surrendering totally to Christ. And we do not have freedom to “come boldly unto the throne” as God’s children until we first submit at the throne. An absolute freedom in the sense of no price being required by anyone,  does not exist. Where freedom is a reality, someone, somewhere has paid and is paying the price and carrying the burden of liberty,  so freedom can continue to exist. 

Freedom is not granted by man but by God.  Man can help in securing and fighting for physical,  but it is the Son of God who makes man free spiritually.  Our forefathers recognized this truth and did their part in appropriating and maintaining liberty by drafting the United States Constitution.  This grand old document with its follow up of the Bill of Rights, is the guide and rule for "We the People",  but has been attacked mercilessly over the past few decades.  If the Constitution can be obliterated or even rewritten, then the enemies of freedom will succeed in destroying the unprecedented individual liberty the citizens of this country have enjoyed as no other people in the history of civilization.  Note the following verses I have recently written in limerick style.

Our Grand Old Document
 
Our fathers shed blood, sweat and tears,
For freedom we now hold with fears,
This Republic is leaning
As libs give new meaning
To these truths set forth in past years.
 
The Constitution's not living, it's settled,
But the enemy has plundered and meddled,
They wrest it and twist
And give their own gist
And try to get everyone rattled.
 
We're ruled by no king or no czar,
For this, people come from afar.
From tyrants they flee
By land, air and sea,
Seeking freedom,  and peace from war.
 
This parchment will guide us true
If kept by the faithful though few.
Though now some may shun it
And others will  burn it,
It still proclaims freedom and truth.
 
So the people, not a king, give the rule,
Guided by it's words that stay true
If we keep it, we'll stay,
In freedom's sure way,
If we leave it, the end is our doom.
 
                                                                     Joseph Harris  5-14-09 
 
Let freedom ring.
    
This writing may be reprinted in whole,  with or without the poem.
Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).
 
May 14, 2009              Number 212

(The following is a rewrite of a Mini Edition written in 2001)

I Love Animals....Really

Everyone has heard of PETA.  If your computer brain cannot quite pull it up, PETA stands for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.  The good folks at PETA are basically animal lovers turned loony.  I never cease to be amazed at their lunacy. Several years back, the Boy Scouts of America had to contend with a Peta assault.  Now keep in mind that the Boy Scouts, which is an institution as American as apple pie, have already had to defend themselves against atheists, who were unhappy because GOD was a part of the Scouts. Next, the feminists railed against them because there were no GIRLS in the BOY Scouts (Brilliant, Huh! That’s why there is a Girl Scouts of America). Then, of course, the gays began harassing and suing because the wholesomeness of the Scouts would not allow homosexual men to be scout leaders. And then, PETA launched their assault at the Scouts.

Why? The Scouts offer proficiency badges in certain areas of accomplishment, specifically in the area of . . . ARE YOU READY FOR THIS - SHUDDER – HORRORS, etc. . . . fishing. I know what you are thinking and I am just as shocked! Now those God-loving, gay bashing, girl hating scouts are torturing and killing innocent little fish.

I realize my sarcasm is a little strong, but PETA really got upset because fish are being maimed and killed and scouts rewarded for the act. No joke. But death is normally what happens to fish after you catch them. I prefer my fish be dead before I eat them. Same thing with squirrels, rabbits, deer, chickens, cows, etc. Like I said, I LOVE animals.  But then, PETA is not happy when any animal is killed for man’s benefit. God may have created animals before He created man, but He created animals for man. Remember, God gave man dominion over animals, not the other way around. Any animal killed should be for the benefit of man (that includes self-defense), or otherwise, I agree that it is wrong to kill the animal, but leave it to PETA and you could never kill a mosquito or roach.

Here is still another example of how ludicrous bleeding-heart liberals can become without using Scripture as their guide. I’ll bet no PETA member is also a joint member of PETHE, People for the Ethical Treatment of Human Embryos, because, like their cousins in Greenpeace, they think animal life is more valuable than human life. It's difficult to find a PETA or Greenpeace member who has the same  passion for  protecting human babies in the womb, as they have for endangered animals and trees.  Note the following lines I recently penned in the form of a limerick:

Hypocrites

They save baby seals from a clubbing,

Those people at PETA are loving.

For fish, birds and deer,

They shed a big tear,

But a child in the womb counts as nothing.

Personally, I think I’ll start my own organization, PAPETA, People Against People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. All prospective members contact me.

Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear)

 
April 9, 2009                  Number 211      
 
More Politically Correct Junk 

I have written on political correctness many times since 2001.  It seems to be a mainstay now in American culture, having become entrenched in institutions and organizations.  In their desire to not be offensive, liberals can actually be entertaining in their quest for sensitivity.  Though we should not seek to be offensive, we should also not go out of our way to change common sense words that give accurate descriptions.  When words are changed, ultimately, meanings change because words have meaning.  I will repeat some thoughts and definitions and throw out some new ones for your consideration.  Over the past few years, the scourge of political correctness has caused people to choose their words carefully to "fit in" with an understanding and tolerant society. Remember, the real goal of PC is to redefine established definitions and effect a change in thinking, attitudes and philosophies. Replacing well established words and phrases with less offensive, "more descriptive " words almost always changes the original understanding. Consider the following list of words. Some are PC, others are "dressed up" to sound better.

Animal trainer...........interspecies communicator

Animals..........non-humans

Bald...............hair challenged (this one gives me a higher self esteem)

Bisexual.........sexually non-preferential

Paper...........processed tree carcass

Bum..........displaced homeowner

Cattle ranch..........cattle concentration camp

Chicken processing plant.............holocaust center 

False teeth.........alternative dentation

Prostitute....sex care provider

Sex change.........gender reassignment

Foreign national without proper documentation........Illegal alien

Anti-sobriety activist..........A drunk

Mechanically dysfunctional............broken

Chronologically detained and challenged.........late

Communication through speech is powerful. Speech is communication and occurs when one expresses thoughts of the mind with words from the mouth. Words are important and do have meaning. The word alcoholic is not harsh sounding and not as offensive as calling someone a drunk. Unfaithful spouse certainly sounds better than adulterer and promiscuity is more pleasing to the ear than fornication.

Jails are no longer known as institutions which incarcerate prisoners. They are adult detention centers where detainees are housed. Why? It just sounds better. After all, we wouldn't want the detainees to bear an extra burden of guilt by reminding them of what they really are (criminals) and what they have really done (broken the law). Notice also, the prisoners of war in the recent war on terror are called detainees. Call me crazy, but I like prisoner of war.

When I hear news reports of some Palestinian militant who has blown himself up along with innocent civilians and bystanders, I have to remind myself that he is a militant not a terrorist. It just sounds better. You've got to admit, militant and gunman both sound better than terrorist or bomber.

How about those high school drop outs? The battle is on to rename them so they will not be plagued with lower self esteem caused by a lifelong negative label. Though I haven't heard the new title yet, I think diploma challenged is nice. In the future I will no longer refer to myself as a professor or teacher, but a classroom facilitator, one who inculcates (teaches) recipients of knowledge (students).

And Black people are no longer Black people, but African Americans, yet not a single Black American I know was born in Africa, and neither were their parents, grandparents or great-grand parents. (Here's a question: if a white person born and reared in South Africa becomes an American citizen, is that person an African American?) This would also apply to Chinese, Italian, Arab, Korean and other ethnic groups. The correct classification should be Americans of African descent, Americans of Chinese descent, Americans of Arab descent, etc., with emphasis on American.

I think we should return to reality in plain speech. The truth is becoming harder to find, yet it is the truth which will set us free.

Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).

February 26, 2009                  Number 209      
                                                                                     
Quotes of Provocation     
 
No words on earth are more sure than the words of God.  His words cut, calm, convict, heal, reveal, guide and speak in a way the words of men cannot do.  Yet, there is still a place for the words of men when they speak truth and provoke the mind.  I love the common sense quotes of great men of the past and present.  I collect quotes and below are just a few of my favorites.
 
A popular evangelist reaches your emotions. A true prophet reaches your conscience. Leonard Ravenhill  
I never expected to see the day when girls would get sunburned in the places they do today.  Will Rogers
He who wrestles with us strengthens our nerves and sharpens our skill.  Our antagonist is our helper.  Edmund Burke
Temptation rarely comes in working hours.  It is in their leisure time that men are made or marred.  W. N. Taylor
If the people who make the decisions are the people who will also bear the consequences of those decisions, perhaps better decisions will result.  John Abrams
This country has come to feel the same when congress is in session as when the baby gets hold of a hammer.  Will Rogers
We are the salt of the earth, mind you, not the sugar. Our ministry is to truly cleanse and not just to change the taste.  Vance Havner 
Success is on the same road as failure; success is just a little further down the road. Jack Hyles 
I remember another Baptist preacher who was converted from a different faith. When asked how it happened, he said: "It was just plain carelessness. Somebody left a New Testament lying open and I read it. Vance Havner 
How can you pull down strongholds of Satan if you don’t even have the strength to turn off your TV?  Leonard Ravenhill
The government's view of the economy: if it moves, tax it.  If it keeps moving, regulate it.  If it stops moving, subsidize it.  Ronald Reagan 
Live in such a way that you would not be afraid to sell your parrot to the town gossip.  Will Rogers
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty or safety.  Benjamin Franklin
You have enemies?  Good.  That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.  Winston Churchhill
How do you tell a communist?  Well, it's someone who reads and Marx and Lenin.  And how do you  tell an anti-communist?  It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.  Ronald Reagan
  
 Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).   
 
December 4, 2008             Number 206      
 
The Myth of Separation of Church and State  

Judge Roy Moore from Alabama became the most hated and most loved man of the hour a few years back. He is a man of integrity who has stood for a cause with a liberty granted him by this country's guiding document, the Constitution. Some say the issue is about the state endorsing, even promoting religion, while others say the real issue is about the interference of the federal government in a state government affair. In a sense, the issue is a combination of both, but is an issue that never in a million years should have been raised. First look at the first amendment to the Constitution and then consider some hard facts about this amendment. The wonderful thing about being an American is you do not have to be an attorney, judge or member of any elite group to learn how to read and interpret the constitution. Just read it, never saying what it doesn't say, with common sense as your guide, allowing it to speak as it's own independent authority. Any other approach will result in "messing" with the grand old document, pulling out "new and exciting truths"  making it a living document, that would amaze the original writers. This season of the year is usually when God hating liberals repeat their mantra of "separation of church and state" as they bellyache about nativity scenes, angels and other Christian related objects, so now is a good time to be reminded of the truth of the freedom granted us in the first amendment, concerning the exercise of religion

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

FACT # 1- The phrase "wall of separation of church and state" appears nowhere in the constitution, and especially not in the first amendment.

FACT # 2- The amendment guarantees the free exercise of religion and freedom of speech.

FACT # 3- The amendment DOES NOT mention government or public property as an exception to the free exercise of religion. NO exceptions are mentioned, period.

FACT # 4- The guarantee of free exercise of religion means religious views CAN be expressed in the political arena.

FACT # 5- Government is to remain absolutely neutral in all matters pertaining to religion, not making laws for the promotion or prohibition of its exercise.

Did you notice fact # 5? Government should keep its nose out of religion. It can't be for or against religion. All rulings that forbid prayer, Bible clubs and such from government school property are illegal, or to use the big word of the day, unconstitutional, according to the first amendment. Rulings that forbid the expression of anything religious, whether on public or private property, are unconstitutional.

Notice also, the phrase "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" is one of the most misunderstood phrases in the constitution. Most believe it is speaking of the establishment of a state church. The first amendment is not primarily for preempting government from establishing a state religion, as most think. Look at the amendment again. The word "respecting" means "in regard to" or "pertaining to" an establishment or institution of religion. The first part of the amendment simply means that "congress shall make no law (for or against) pertaining to any religious organization, institution or establishment." The instituting of a state endorsed church or denomination would be automatically prohibited on these grounds alone.

The first amendment is all about freedom OF religion, not freedom FROM religion. The idea that government, politics and society should be free FROM religion is a hatched up notion of God hating liberals via the ACLU, PAW and numerous other freedom destroying institutions. Not only does the amendment PREVENT government from interfering in expression of religion, it calls for protection of the rights of individuals as they practice the free exercise thereof. The ACLU should be protecting, not prohibiting free exercise. Note also, the word "exercise" means to act upon, not simply give mental ascent to a creed or set of beliefs. We are not only allowed freedom of belief, but the freedom to live out and express those beliefs. This means the Boy Scouts of America have a constitutional right to reject homosexual leaders, thereby exercising or practicing their belief. It means parents have a right to home school or send their children to a Christian school if they so desire.

Religion that cannot be practiced in daily life is useless. Don't believe the liberal lie of the left. Religion and free expression of it is not illegal. It is not only legal,  but guaranteed by government. Thank God. Let freedom ring.

 Thousands of pages of American history would have to be burned to delete all references to God and religion among the documents of the founding fathers of this country.

 Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).   

October 30, 2008                 Number 205      

Insanity

What is sanity? Clear, sound rational thinking. Insanity is the opposite. Insane people do crazy things because they think crazy thoughts. We live in an insane society that perverts (reverses) truth and calls Christianity insane.  A Biblical example of this is found in Isaiah 5:20.  Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!   As usual, the Bible has something to say about insanity.

Notice first a Biblical view of insanity from a person full of the devil. Mark chapter 5,_A Wild Man.  There are parallels today in people who may not be totally possessed as this man was, but who are influenced by the devil as they exhibit certain characteristics that parallel this Biblical account. Notice, he had unrest and was crying.  Insanity or mental problems are often characterized by emotional unrest and outbursts of crying.  He was also unloved by himself and others as shown by the self destruction as he cut himself with stones.  Lack of love for self today is also exhibited by people who cut, pierce and mark their bodies in a permanent, self destructive way in the piercing and tattoo culture, usually done in the name of style and fashion.  Notice the man was also unclothed and this is certainly seen today as nakedness in public is more and more common.  But look at verse 15.…after coming to Jesus, he was sitting, clothed and in  his right mind.  He had peace, love and covering.

Next, notice a Biblical view of insanity from a person filled with the world and self. Luke chapter 15,_A Worldly Son.  He was rash in his thinking as he requested his inheritance early.  He was riotous in his living as he spent all in partying.  He ended up in poverty and filth in the pig pen.  He was drunk with insanity on the wine of the world, but then verse 17 states he..."came to himself" which means he was out of his mind (insane).  

For a third example, look at a Biblical view of sanity from a person filled with the Spirit.  Acts chapter 26,_A Witnessing Preacher.  Paul is accused of being insane by the governor, Festus, simply because he was living for God, doing what comes natural for a believer.  Paul has: (1) Given his testimony of salvation, verses 12- 15.  This should be normal for every believer, but the world will look at you cock-eyed if you go around telling how you were saved.  Paul also: (2) Witnessed to everyone, verse 20, which every believer is called to do.  Paul also was: (3) Obedient to God, verse 19.  Obedience to God often brings mocking and ridicule from unbelievers because they just don't understand why real Christians do certain things.  Paul was accused of being insane (verse 24) simply by being an obedient believer in Christ.  The world still does the same today to true believers.  So do not be dismayed. To live for God is sane. 

A fourth example from the Bible is found in II Timothy 1:7,  A Well Taught Convert  Paul told Timothy that God has given a "sound mind"  to His children, verse 7.  Living for God is sane.  Doing the right thing is sane.  Insanity is when the world says black is white and white is black and bitter is sweet and sweet is bitter, but rest assured, living for God is right and sane.  Stay grounded and assured in the Word of God.  "The thoughts of the righteous are right... " Proverbs 12:5.  Life is easier and less complicated if you live by God's rules.  Breaking His law brings complications, troubles, sorrows and consequences.  People who do not steal have less complications and consequences in life.  People who do not kill have better lives than murderers.  People who do not lie live easier lives than liars and deceivers.  Doing right has its rewards.

To live for God, we must guard our sanity.  Titus 2:6,  II Cor. 10:5,  Phil. 4:8,  A Walk of Watchfulness  Think purposefully on the virtues of Phil. 4:8.  Guard your mind as ordered in II Cor. 10:5.  Doing right is done on purpose and rarely by accident.  Doing wrong comes naturally.  Think right and sanely.

 Insanity Says, “Live for now”........Sanity Says “Live for eternity”

Insanity Says, “If it feels good, do it”.......Sanity Says, “If it feels good, watch it”

Insanity Says, “Live together first, and see if it will work”.......Sanity Says, “Commit to marriage first, then make it work”

Insanity Says, “ All religions lead to Heaven”.......Sanity Says, “Jesus is the Door”

Insanity Says, “ Wait until later to accept Christ”.......Sanity Says, “Boast not thyself of tomorrow, for thou knowest not what a day may bring forth”  Proverbs 27:1

 Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear). 

 
October 92008                   Number 204      
                                                                                                      
Snow White and the Seven Church Members

Several years ago, when my daughter was around five years of age, we rented the Disney classic, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.  I vividly remember the scene where the dwarfs came in and found Snow White asleep in their loft.  Some of them had apparently never seen a woman and didn't know "what" she was.  Grumpy recognized her and said, "Stay away from her.  She's a woman and they've got wicked wiles."  One of the other dwarfs asked him what wicked wiles were, and he paused then said, "I don't know, but I'm a'gin  'em." 

I had never realized before that Grumpy was an old hard headed Baptist.  Of course then my mind began to wander and before long, the preacher in me took over and I had a sermon with a parallel between the seven dwarfs and seven different kinds of church members that can be found in just about every Baptist congregation today.  Some are good, others bad, and a few just downright worrisome.

Doc was the first dwarf and obviously the leader of the group.  He pulls them all together and keeps things going.  He could be called "Doc" because he might effect healing when it is needed.  Docs are a healing balm in each church and provide direction, calm the storms and bring peace through their spiritual maturity and leadership.

Sleepy was the dwarf who was always sleepy, night or day.  He can be seen yawning and snoozing throughout the film.  I've known several church members who are sleepy.  Some actually do sleep during the church service, but the average "sleepy" member is asleep at the wheel, snoring while Rome burns, the devil destroys their home and church and souls go to hell.  The Bible says to "Awake thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light.  Eph. 5:14.

Grumpy's name speaks for itself.  Though very perceptive, he was never happy.  He chose to be a grump, always emphasizing the negative, walking on the dark side.  The only time he ever smiled was when Snow White kissed him on top of his bald head, then when he realized he was actually happy, he immediately wiped off the smile with a "Harumph!"  It seems there is always a Grumpy in every church whose motto is, "Every silver lining has a cloud" when their motto should be, "This is the day the Lord hath made, I will rejoice and be glad in it, even if it is a rotten day."  Grumpys have few friends,  but need loving, because their grumpiness is often an attention ploy.

Happy was the exact opposite of Grumpy.  He saw the positive in every situation and spread cheer and hope.  The Happys in every church are a needed blessing as they lift the fallen and bind the wounded.  Their "cheerful heart doeth good"  to all as the goodness of the light of God shines in the darkest of valleys that every church must sometimes pass through.  

Sneezy was apparently allergic to something.  He was often seen with his finger under his nose, trying to stifle a sneeze.  Now let me use a little sanctified imagination here (which is the birthright of every preacher) and describe the Sneezy in every church.  They are allergic to work and commitment.  Ask them to help in Vacation Bible School and you get an allergic reactive sneeze.  Challenge them to be faithful to church and another "ACHOO" spews out.  Preach on tithing and a fit of violent sneezes come forth.  Sneezy just can't handle it.

Bashful was just as his name stated: extremely shy.  He could talk, but hardly did.  He wasn't a bad guy, didn't cause any trouble and was not disliked.  He was just bashful.  Churches are full of his brothers and sisters today.  They are good people and they will talk about golf, deer hunting, fishing, shopping and the latest styles, but are tight lipped when it comes to talking about Jesus.  They spend hours a day with family, school mates and co-workers, and never even mention Jesus, much less tell of His saving grace.  These incognito Christians would probably cause their friends to drop dead of shock if they began telling the wonderful words of life in their daily conversation.

Dopey is last but not least, though he appeared to be the youngest.  One thing was for certain about Dopey.  You never heard him say a negative or derogatory word about the other dwarfs, Snow White, or even the wicked queen.  Of course he never said a word about anyone or anything......period.  Dopey never talked.  Often times, people talk too much and when they do, the conversation can turn negative, ungodly or destructive.   In the Disney film, Bambi, Thumper said that his father told him that "If you can't say somethin' good about somebody, don't say nuthin' at all."   Oh,  for more Dopey Christians in churches today.  "And that ye study to be quiet, and to do your own business, and to work with your own hands, as we commanded you.  I Thessalonians 4:11.

Now which one are you?

Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).                                     

September 18, 2008            Number 202      
 
Racism, Discrimination, and Segregation 

Political correctness is a scourge in the media today. Reporters and pundits are usually too afraid to speak the truth on any issue that might be connected to race, unless it is to label someone a racist. Consider the recent shameless debacle of the character assassination of nominee Charles Pickering. He is a good, decent man, and is not a racist. I know this to be a fact from personal acquaintance with the man. His real crime is being a conservative who is nominated by President Bush.

Concerning racist language, I do not believe anyone should intentionally slander or use hurtful words against another race, culture, gender or person. But hurtful words exist and are a part of history with numerous examples in many American literary works. The writings of Mark Twain and the poet Carl Sandburg come to mind. People today refer to the slang word "nigger" as the "N" word, afraid to actually say it within the literary context in which it may be found, thereby equating it with vulgarities and obscenities that are censored and bleeped out. I do not personally think this word should be used in a derogatory manner, BUT, to place it on the same level as vulgar and obscene four letter words that are unmentionable is ridiculous. I do not believe the word should be used in an offensive manner to denigrate and hurt people, but most of the ones who are crying "foul" have made a career of being offended. Vote pandering liberals and race baiting Black leaders such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have almost succeeded in having the word removed from history, literature, and classic films, labeling anyone who might use or read the word in a quote, as a white supremist, card carrying Klan member who would lynch all Blacks if only given the opportunity. Ridiculous! Disney has never re-released the classic Song of the South film. The movie is set in the time of American slavery, a very real part of American history, but there would certainly be an outcry if it was ever released again.

Among these thin skinned individuals are Blacks who do not even like to use the word "Black" but refer to themselves as African Americans, though few, if any of them were born in Africa or have even visited there. The correct terminology would be, Americans of African descent, as in Americans of Italian descent, Americans of Arab descent, etc. In other words, any American of foreign descent is American FIRST. But multi-culturalism has robbed many of pride in their American heritage.

The mere mention of an individual's race is not racist. In other words, all racial references are not racist(remember the Rush Limbaugh flap). Facts are facts and cannot be changed. According to the media, in their quest to not offend, when a murder occurs and the suspect is a Black person, then excuses are made for his behavior. But if a Black person is killed by a white person, the White murderer is immediately considered a racist. If a certain crime statistic reveals a higher percentage of Blacks or Hispanics are incarcerated as opposed to Whites, the cry "racism" is heard, yet, if the data is accurate, facts are facts. That is not racism, just factism. Truth is color blind.

I once read a news story about a Black mother who left her small kids alone at home during the day for weeks on end, while she went to work. The first response I heard was how this incident was proof of the lack of child care available and how the government must provide more child care workers or funds for her to pay for child care. To decry the crime of the woman was equated with racism. And the problem, according to the media, was not that she was irresponsible in her actions, but that the government was failing to help her raise her children. Child care is not the responsibility of government.

A common cry from some Blacks of today is that of victimization. They are "victims" in a White man's world. The truth is, they really have been victimized.....by White and Black liberals. Those who claim to be for the little guy, the poor and the minorities, have actually created a slave system of government dependency, thereby robbing these groups of the liberty to be all they can be, discovering their untapped potential. They have been successful in hypnotizing many blacks, including many Black preachers, into believing they cannot make it on their own and their economic salvation lies in the Democratic party and the promises of self appointed Black saviors. But the tide is turning and there is a growth in conservatism among Blacks today, as they throw off the man made shackles, reject government socialism, accept responsibility and begin to think for themselves. Until more Blacks take this step, they will remain in the racist world of Jesse Jackson, who is the king of racists.

Does any of this mean there is no such thing as racism?  Certainly not.  Racism is a part of humanity. It is virtually as old as the human race. Racism is also wrong. There is a litmus test which can be used to determine if you are racist. For instance, if you believe any individual is going to act a certain way or be predisposed to do certain things simply because of their color of skin or ethnicity, then you are a racist. If you think someone is more likely to be lazy, steal, be immoral, etc. simply because they are of a certain race or ethnic group, then you are racist.

If a certain act, acts, lifestyle, or philosophy seems to be more prevalent in one people group than in another, then culture is the culprit, not race. For instance, a people group speaks a certain language, not because of some inward racial programming, but because of culture and geographical location. There is, however, one inward trait which is inherited by all, regardless of race, and that is depravity. Sin is inherited by all from father Adam and only ONE person ever missed inheriting sin.....Jesus Christ. And that was simply because Joseph, who was descended from Adam, was not His father. The presence of sin is the root cause of racism and bigotry in mankind.

Is there a word from the Bible on racism? Is there any scriptural precedent on how man should treat man? In John chapter 4, Jesus was so concerned about the eternal destiny of the hated Samaritans, verse 4 states, "He must needs go through Samaria." The Jews hated the Samaritans and the Samaritans hated the Jews. The Samaritans were half Gentile, so race, as well as religion was an issue. Verse 27 tells us the disciples marveled that he even talked to the woman.

The book of the Acts gives conclusive proof that the gospel is for all men everywhere. Notice in chapter 8, Phillip the evangelist was sent on a divine mission to the Ethiopian Eunuch to explain the gospel so he could be saved. In chapter 9, a son of Abraham, Shaoul the Rabbi was saved on the Damascus road and later sent out as a missionary in chapter 13 with Barnabas. In chapter 10, God had to twist Peter's arm to convince him to take the gospel to Cornelius, a Gentile. Even then, Peter argued with God about the issue. Imagine, correcting God, but racism blinds to the truth and the God of truth. Chapters eight, nine and ten shout out a powerful message that God is no respecter of persons. The Ethiopian in chapter 8 is a descendant of Ham. Paul in chapter 9 is a descendant of Shem and Cornelius in chapter 10 is a descendant of Japheth. Each one is descended from one of the three sons of Noah, representing the three main people groups in the world.

Then notice the scripture in Matthew 24:7. The rise of racism is a sign of the end time preceding the return of Jesus Christ. "For nation shall rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom..." No doubt, wars and rumors of wars are also an end time sign and kingdom against kingdom describes this prophecy, but nation against nation describes racial strife. The word "nation" is speaking of nationality, tribe, race and ethnicity, or race against race. There seems to have been an increase in racial tension world wide over the past several years. The issue of "ethnic cleansing" in Bosnia was racial, not just religious. And racial problems in this country, especially in metropolitan areas, seem to be on the rise.

The Bible makes no distinction between Blacks, Whites, Hispanics, etc. It does, however, make a distinction between Jew and Gentile, but the New Testament then erases this distinction in Christ, since the middle wall of partition has been broken down. There is one other very strong distinction of two classes of people found in the Bible: the haves and the have-nots. Whoever has the Son has life and whoever has not the Son does not have life, but the wrath of God abiding on him. A true believer (one of the haves) filled the love of God, will not make an issue of race. 

A fallacy often found today is the assumption that all discrimination is wrong.  Everyone discriminates.  I discriminate when choosing what to watch on TV, or what to view as entertainment, or who I want to spend time with.  Is that wrong?  I explained this one day in one of my classes at Southeastern Baptist College.  When I "got off on" the issue of race and prejudice, some of the students, Black and White, began to get uncomfortable.  I told the students to take notice at lunch time and watch as students left the campus to go eat at different restaurants in town.  My point was that birds of a feather would flock together.  Sure enough, most of the guys segregated from the girls and went together, the girls teamed up and went out and most of the Black ministers gathered up and went out to eat together, as well as our non-traditional ministerial students (non-traditional because they are older than the younger college kids and have families) who "discriminated" against all the rest, and grouped together.  Did any of these groups discriminate against any of the other groups?  No.  They made discriminate choices concerning who they wanted to spend time with, but did not discriminate AGAINST anyone.  At gatherings, religious and secular, I have seen men gather with men to fellowship, women gather with women, and among the children, boys with boys, girls with girls, rednecks with rednecks, professionals with professionals, but you get the picture.  People of similar gender or interests or backgrounds or culture, gravitate to one another. They are not shunning others, just simply choosing their comfort zone.  When allowed to choose, humans, as a rule, choose to segregate with their own kind, whether by race, gender, class or socioeconomic level. 

Bottom line: Talking about facts of race is not racism. All discrimination is not wrong, and mutual segregation by choice is a normal accepted practice.

Joseph Harris welcomes the hate letters of all who disagree with him and God.

 Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).                                     

August 6, 2008                 Number 201      
 
Hate Speech

Disagree with the ungodly on any point, at any depth, and you are a hatemonger using hate speech.  Period.  This is the open and shut verdict pronounced by the media today.  Speak against homosexuality, pedophilia, bestiality, adultery, and other acts plainly denounced by scripture, and you are a hateful hater of the ones guilty of the acts.  The same is true if you speak the truth about Islam and it's mandate to persecute or kill unbelievers. If you insist on calling a specific candidate by his full name, Barak Hussein Obama, then you are hateful, trying to smear his name, (actually the name Hussein does a good enough job of smearing itself).  If you speak the truth about illegal aliens, you automatically hate all Mexicans.  Whether or not you boycott McDonalds over their obvious in-your-face decision to support homosexuality and same sex marriage, you still have the right to exercise your constitutionally guaranteed free speech and the right to choose where to spend your money.   Speaking of rights, everyone should have the right to exercise their free speech without being called a hater. 

I have noticed that liberals are almost always guilty of what they accuse others of doing.  They cry "tolerance" and then are intolerant of everything that opposes their agenda.  Just recently, a group of lesbians shut down a speech given by Ryan Sorba, called "The Born Gay Hoax" at Smith College in Northampton, MA, by storming the room and shouting him down.  Security did nothing.  When they accuse others of bigotry, I have found they are usually greater bigots.  They want free speech for filth, but not for the reading of the Bible (but the Koran is ok) or for prayers to be offered on "sacred government property" (What an oxymoron).    

Just recently, some "gays" called for a boycott of a San Diego hotel, because the owner donated a sum of money for the promotion of the referendum to be placed on the California ballot to protect the sanctity of marriage and oppose so-called marriage of the same sex.  Turn about is fair play.  I wonder how the wording would sound if covered, in fairness,  by the media?  "This just in: A group of left wing, mean spirited homosexuals have just called for a boycott of a luxury hotel,  based on the politics of the owner.  This boycott appears to be motivated by hate.  Hatred has no place in our culture."  By the way, you can imagine the success of their boycott.  The hotel was booked solid the next week. 

Is anyone naive enough to believe they will ever read or hear words similar to the preceding news report coming over the airwaves or in print,  with today's biased reporting?  The last line, "Hatred has no place in our culture"  is an exact quote from a McDonalds spokesman concerning the AFA boycott, indicating the boycotters hate homosexuals.  Just for the record, I do not hate homosexuals, but do hate homosexuality, a self destructive, sinful, chosen lifestyle.  I once heard someone say they hated cancer, after it claimed the life of their loved one.  With today's spin, that individual must hate everyone with cancer.  How hateful.   

If you are guilty of hate speech, then you can be found guilty of a hate crime.  And this is the goal.   Both Canada and Sweden have hate speech laws on their books to protect deviants.  Hitler's fascism began with silencing his opposition and this is exactly what homosexuals, C.A.I.R., Jesse Jackson, Democrats and liberal Republicans (Remember the McCain-Feingold folly), Barry Lynn, N.O.W., and many others are trying to do.  Silence the opposition.  Let your voice be heard.  Speak the truth with charity, but always in boldness.  "Open rebuke is better than secret love."  Proverbs 27:5.  And remember this old axiom from childhood: "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me" which is just a proverbial way of saying "Grow Up".

 Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).  


   July 16, 2008                 Mini Edition by Joseph Harris               Number 199      

Special Mini Edition. Guest Editorial By Brother Ritechus N. Dignation                                           
 
           Things That Just Rip My Gizzard

I have a list of things that really get next to me. I mean these things just chap my hide, rip my gizzard and generally hack me off. Everyone probably has a list like this. Ever' once in a while, it's good to blow off a little steam, so here are some things that are on my hit list.

(1) Church Fundraisers- The Lord's got a plan for financing His church and her ministries. That plan don't include selling donuts, having spaghetti suppers, holding car washes and rafflin' off the family dog. God's plan is called the "open your wallet and give cheerfully" plan. Church members ought to tithe and give above the tithe for special things. If the young'uns want to go on a trip, the church ought to be able to take care of it, instead of sendin' them traipsin' up and down the streets sellin' junk that nobody wants to buy anyway. Why, if ever'body in every church just tithed, the church would have to hold special meetin's just to figure out how to use all the extra money for the Lord's work.

(2) Unfaithful Church Workers- The sorry way in which elected workers treat the Lord's work is a shame. I've seen Sunday School teachers not show up and never tell 'nary a soul they weren't coming. I've seen committees elected to take care of important business (any business for the Lord is important) and never hold the first meetin'. If they performed on their money payin' job the way they work for the church, they would be fired before noon on Monday. The Lord's work is not second rate.

(3) Stingy Church Treasurers- Let me explainify. I'm talkin' about treasurers who treat the church's money as their own private stash. In one church I pastored, the treasurer had a coniption every time the church voted to spend a penny. The church once voted to spend $50.00 on needed supplies. When I went to the money man for a check, he balked, turned red in the face, wrote the check and threw it at me. I considered givin' him a holy slap, but declined. The church voted to spend that money. Well, he later resigned and we commenced with spendin'.

(4) Dead Preachin'- Nothing is harder to endure than dead preachin'. Old Brother E. M. Bounds used to say, "Dead men preach dead sermons, and dead sermons kill." I know a preacher who literally puts the congregation to sleep. His people say church is where they get their best nap. Late one night, one of his members couldn't get to sleep, so she called up this preacher and asked him to give her a little devotion on the phone. She was snoozin' in no time. Now, I know what your thinkin', and No, the preacher don't have to rant, rave, yell, stomp, snort and foam at the mouth to give some good preachin'. Ever'body's different. But every preacher ought to be excited and enthusiastic about his message. And folks can tell if you ain't.

Now send me a list of your gripes. Brother Ritechus N. Dignation 

The books, Rantings and Ravings From Brother Ritechus N Dignation, Book 1 and More Rantings and Ravings From Brother Ritechus N Dignation, Book 2 can be purchased online at www.josephharrismagic.net with a credit card through PayPal or they are available for $6.00 each (includes postage) by writing to Joseph Harris 77 Neil Road Ellisville, MS 39437.

                                                             
Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).                                     

July 8, 2008                          Number 198      

Things You Will Never See, Things I Would Like To See 
 
In the tradition of Mini Editions 146 (News Headlines You Never See) and 147 (Things You Cannot Say In America), I am listing in this edition some other things you will not see as well as some stuff I would like to see. 

Things You Will Never See 

Ted Kennedy as the head of Mother’s against Drunk Drivers. (Or Teddy teaching swimming lessons)

Libya, China and Sudan heading the human rights commission in the UN. (Actually, it's been done) 

The ACLU suing for the right for students to pray and read the Bible in schools.

The Head of the Palestinian Authority observing Hanukkah.

Jesse Jackson elected as the head of the Sons of the Confederacy. (Or him accepting) 

Tim Robbins, Susan Sarandon, and the Dixie Chicks going overseas to entertain the troops.

Bill Clinton teaching a course on abstinence, self control and honesty.

Things I would Like To See

PETA holding a fundraising bar-b-que. (I would buy tickets)

The NAACP actually working for the Advancement of Colored People instead of causing further division and animosity between the races.

For once I would love to hear an objective, complete, well rounded, factual news report from NBC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, and all other liberal XYZ outlets.

A franchise of Greenpeace sawmills and fur outlets. 

I would like to see the big boy media ask Barak Hussein Obama some real, hardball questions.

I would like to hear Republicans admit that John McCain is not a conservative. 

I would like for Islam to come clean and admit that Mohammed evangelized by the sword, hated Jews, and was intolerant of all who disagreed with him, and that if given half a chance, Islam would force all "infidels" to convert.

I would pay ten bucks to hear any liberal Democrat say that Senator Robert Byrd is a racist.

I would pay twenty to hear a Republican say that Trent Lott is not a racist.

I would love to read in Time or Newsweek or any publication by the American Psychological Association that homosexuality is a destructive, chosen behavior and still a major cause of the spread of AIDS. 

And last, it would be great to see Barry Lynn organize a See You At the Pole prayer meeting on public school property.

Send me your lists. jhh

                                                               
Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).                                     

June 19, 2008                 Mini Edition by Joseph Harris               Number 197      

                            The Right Foundation
 
A good foundation is always important. A solid foundation is essential in the construction of a building. A strong academic background is important for success in higher education. The parable Jesus told about the wise man and the foolish man is more than just a children’s Bible story. Rock is always preferable to sand for a foundation.

America’s "multi-cultural diverse" society is built upon the sand of man’s wisdom and not the rock of God. Our public government education system is built on the sinking sand of humanism and relativism and not the solid rock of absolute truth. American politics is built on the sand of public opinion instead of principles based upon God’s wisdom. Many modern churches are built upon marketing to the consumer's needs with no regard for what pleases God.  I could go on with examples, but you get the picture.

Though it sounds too simple, the basic "why" of man’s problems is traced directly back to the exclusion of God. Now don’t go to the illogical conclusion that the presence of God means the absence of all problems, or you might get initiated into the "name it and claim it" club and begin your own program on TBN. "Man . . . is born unto trouble," according to a wise man who well knew by experience.

Notice,  the Bible does not begin with a plea for salvation or how to live a holy life or how to be victorious over sin. It begins with the foundation of the existence of GOD. Genesis 1:1 does not even try to prove the existence of God. It assumes His existence. The scripture simply says, "In the beginning, GOD . . ." Belief in God as Creator is foundational because if you do not accept the existence of the Creator, nothing else matters. Acceptance of God as Creator precedes acceptance of God as Savior. The foundation must precede the building. This fact explains why Satan tries to supplant the Creator and creation with evolution. If there is no Creator, there is nothing. Zero. No beginning, no ending and nothing in between, hence we are all animals with no purpose for existence and no destination but the grave. Wow, what hope and comfort evolution gives!

Christianity supplies something no other religion, philosophy or world view can completely give: (1) beginning; (2) purpose, and (3) destination. Christianity provides a perfect trinity of explanation of: (1) origin of everything (God), (2) the meaning of life (glorify God), and (3) the conclusion of it all (eternity with or without God). Notice, God is the center of the threefold explanation.

God is essential. Man is not capable of ultimate success apart from God because of depravity,  and real success is more than having money or things. Man, left to himself, apart from God, will always degenerate. Since Adam, every person has entered this world with a predisposition to turn away from God and commit sin. Every society in human history that ignored God eventually crumbled.

When it comes to your life, don’t just include God. Build your life around Him. Place God at the center. Put Him first in your life, first in your marriage, first in your finances, and first in your work.  "For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ."  I Corinthians 3:11.

Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).  

 

          June 5, 2008                Number 196      

                                      Surprised?
 
      An old saying tells us that life is full of surprises, but some things should not catch us by surprise.  And especially those events that give a forerunner of their happening.  When the ungodly seem to win a victory over morality and purity, some Christians seem surprised.   Their surprise almost surprises me.
     Who is surprised over the news from California about "gay" marriage, as the same sex marriage ban was overturned by that wide majority vote, 4-3?  A homosexual "couple"(Ain't no such thing) can now apply for a marriage license.  We have already seen the hand writing on the wall in Massachusetts, which is a hotbed of homosexuality, with homosexual sympathizers.  Remember, this is the home of Barney Frank, the queer representative of the fourth congressional district of Massachusetts.  And don't forget their illustrious senator, Chappaquiddick Ted, that moralizing Kennedy who left Mary Jo Kopechne to die trapped in the car submerged in water, while he swam to safety, then waited nine hours to report the accident.  With elected officials like the aforementioned men, who could possibly be surprised at anything that might come out of Massachusetts.  And now California, a state known for it's liberalism, has a handful of judicial activists telling the dissenting majority of the population that the will of the majority is worthless.  61 % of the people of California approved the ban on homosexual marriage.  The phrase "homosexual marriage" is a paradox that voids itself.  It's kind of like talking about cold fire, dry water or Christian adultery.  It is a self canceling paradox.  Is that redundant?
     Was anyone surprised with the removal of Judge Roy Moore as Chief Justice of Alabama, a few years back?  Why be surprised when God and his commandments have already been removed?  The natural step of progression is to remove God's man.  And remove him they did.  The  nine member Court of the Judiciary, presided over by Judge William Thompson,  voted to remove Judge Moore.  The only surprising thing about this event was that Thompson led the court in prayer at the beginning, asking God to bless the proceedings of the court.  This was laughable....asking God to bless the removal of the very man who has tried to keep God's blessing on the people by honoring God's laws.  Insanity rules. 
     Then there is the display of ungodliness, vulgarity and filth on the airwaves.  No one is surprised or shocked anymore, and I'm speaking of regular TV.  X rated programming has been on the television for 30 years, since the advent of pay TV as found on HBO, SINemax and other purveyors of pornography.  When the filth switched over to "mainstream" TV, no one was surprised.....or cared.  This is nothing more than the natural course of events.  We have been de-sensitized to that which was previously shocking.  We may not be surprised, but we should be ashamed.

Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).  
                                   
 
 LESSONS FROM COMICS

I hope the kid in me never grows up. For instance, I like to read the Sunday comics. It’s amazing what can be found in what we used to call, when I was a kid, the funny papers. Sometimes they are profound and true to life.

A few years back, I came across a series that was new to me. “Zits” was the name of the comic series. The beginning panels showed a woman pulling out a pair of rubber gloves and attaching a face mask, kind of like a filter. She then took a pair of tongs and pulled a tape from a VCR and dropped it in a garbage bag with a look of disgust on her face as if she smelled a bad odor. The last panel contained the only dialogue in the strip. Two guys were sitting in front of the TV, watching her actions, and the first one made a remark about how the woman (the other guy’s Mom) did not like coarse language. The second guy responded with an exasperated look on his face saying the movie was only rated PG-13.

How true to life. I expect this attitude from the world, since society has become so de-sensitized. Things are accepted today that would not have been tolerated 40 years ago. I do, however, expect something different from professing Christians, who seldom use much discrimination in their choices of TV and film entertainment. I have been told, “Well, it’s only rated PG or PG-13" as if the rating alone makes it acceptable. Usually, films with these “mild” ratings contain obscene, vulgar, and profane language. When you point out the adultery and homosexuality that might be in the film, the excuse is, “Well, this is real life. These things exist in the real world.” True, and these things are usually not rebuked in the real world either. A film containing these themes at least has some redeeming value when it shows the consequences, tragedy, and destruction of these and other sins, instead of presenting them in an amoral, nonjudgmental way. Plus the world view presented and promoted by the film should be considered. And remember, the Motion Picture Association rates films, and this group is not comprised of conservative Bible believers.

A steady diet of filth, perversity, blasphemy, nudity, hedonism, etc, etc, does have an affect on the consumer. We as Christians believe constant exposure to the Word affects people. How can we not believe constant exposure to the world will do the same? In the name of entertainment, professing Christians will subject themselves to vile, lewd, anti-God behavior and language, while they as Christians abstain from the use of the same language and lifestyles portrayed on the screen. This is inconsistency with a capital I. If you do not use profanity, then don’t pay to hear others use it. If you don’t take God’s name in vain, then don’t promote it by endorsing it and financially supporting the ones who profane God. If you do not believe in adultery, homosexuality, etc., then don’t laugh at the crude humor and applaud when it is practiced by others. And any woman who bares her body for millions to see is on the level of a harlot and should be prayed for, not exalted and adored as a sex symbol.

I’m not saying bury your head in the sand, but I am saying we should use plain common sense guided by Scripture. “Keep your heart with all diligence, for out of it are the issues of life.” Beware what you allow into your heart, “For from the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaks.” Sadly, this simple comic strip of few words, speak volumes.

Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).  

                                   

 

                IS MORMONISM CHRISTIAN?

Forgetfulness is a part of human nature. The older I get, the more human I become. This tendency to forget is one reason why we as Christians must read our Bibles regularly. We usually know truth when we see it, but tend to “forget” when not constantly reminded.

For instance, amid the glimmering and positive image that is used to portray Mormonism, let’s not forget that it is still a cult which denies fundamental Bible doctrines. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints was established by Joseph Smith around the mid 1800's. He was disgruntled with the divided religious denominations of his day. Smith claims that when he asked God to show him which one of the current churches was the true church, God told him none of them . . . they were all wrong. God then stated he wanted JS to be his true prophet and “restore” the true gospel back into the world, since it had been lost through the corrupt churches.

Smith didn’t restore the lost truth anymore than the reformers recovered true doctrine that had been “lost” through the Catholicism of the Dark Ages. The truths which the reformers claimed to restore were still being proclaimed and practiced by true Bible believing churches, known throughout church history by various names, and persecuted by Catholicism. From the time Christ started His church, to the present, true churches have perpetually existed preaching true doctrine. Bible doctrine has been “messed with” throughout church history, but was never lost.

Joseph Smith, using a buffet line mentality, picked and chose what he wanted from Christianity, sprinkled in a tablespoon of Freemasonry, added a dash of mysticism and created the smorgasbord of Mormonism. The problem is, God never hired him as the chef.

Mormonism claims JS is the last prophet for mankind, but Hebrews 1:1 plainly states Jesus is God’s final prophet, and that excludes Mohammed also. Mormonism teaches Jesus is a god, while the scriptures teach Jesus is God, and not just divinity, but deity. Mormonism teaches salvation by righteous works and accountability before the judgment seat of a trinity of God, Jesus and Joseph Smith. All this and more, was supposedly revealed to Joseph Smith by an angel from Heaven.

Again, lest we forget, Mormonism is not true Biblical Christianity, but a mutated corruption, sprinkled with a fairy tale element (man may become God), which corrupts the simplicity of the Gospel (II Corinthians 11:3). “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you, than that we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.” Galatians 1:8

Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).  

 

April 3, 2008                 Mini Edition by Joseph Harris               Number 193      

                          I'm Just Thankful  

What shall I render unto the Lord for all He has done for me? How can I ever repay His goodness, gifts, and blessings. Well, I can’t. But I can sure try. Reflecting upon the goodness of God should overwhelm and humble each recipient. We often take for granted the "little" things in life, like life itself, good health, family, friends, and material blessings. I have tried to list a few things below for which I am extremely grateful. 

I'm thankful that, in this nation founded on Christian principles from scripture, we can still assemble and preach the Gospel of Jesus, which is the only answer to our sin problem. 

I’m thankful that with the privilege of being a US citizen, I can own property and bear arms to protect my family, if needed.

I'm thankful that I can still make my small voice heard at the voting booth.

I’m thankful I live in America and not a country dominated by Islam.

I’m thankful that my wife loves me and supports my ministry work, and am especially thankful for our daughter and son.

I’m thankful for the prayers of God’s people for one another in times of distress, trouble, heartache, sickness and mourning.

I’m thankful God called me to preach and placed me in a preaching/teaching ministry twenty five years ago.

I’m thankful for the hundreds of students in my college classes over the past 21 years, for teaching me as I taught them.

I’m thankful for my Christian heritage from a Godly preacher father and mother who are now in Heaven.

I’m thankful for my five brothers and sisters.

And last of all (no offence to Yankees here), I’m thankful I was born and bred in the south where I learned to hunt and eat squirrels and rabbits, set trot lines for catfish, gather eggs from the chicken yard, pluck chickens, eat cornbread dressing, grits, "taters," "mater" gravy and biscuits, learned to pick and shell peas and beans, raise corn and squash, bale and haul hay, run cows, fall asleep on the porch at night, hear good old fashioned preaching and singing in a country church,  etc., etc. Now that’s living.

Folks, I’m just thankful. And I’m especially thankful for you Mini Edition subscribers and the readers of Mini Edition in the papers that reprint it weekly and monthly, and the editors. God bless you. You have been so encouraging. Now go tell someone you appreciate them. 

Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).  
                                   


March 20, 2008                 Mini Edition by Joseph Harris               Number 192      

Why You Should Not Home School Your Children
 
The education debate continues.  Should kids be sent to public government schools, private and/or Christian schools, or be home schooled?  The choice should belong to the parents.  As I have written on this issue in the past, it seems to have generated more response that just about any other topic I have written on in the past 7 years.  And I usually lose subscribers, since they view my pro-Christian school and home schooling views as an attack on them personally, if their kids attend government schools.  This is not an attack, but my opinion and view.  Just put on your thick skin and you will be okay. 
 
I received the tongue-in-cheek article "Why You Should Not Home School Your Children" and liked it so much I decided to add my own thoughts.  The author was anonymous, so I can't give credit.  See if you can determine which ones I added.  By the way, my wife and I home school our children (as if you couldn't guess)  If you are a home schooler, send this to some of your home school buddies.  jhh.
 
Why You Should Not Home School Your Children
 
Most parents were educated in the under-funded public school system, and so
are not smart enough to home-school their own children.
 
Children who receive one-on-one home-schooling will learn more than others,
giving them an unfair advantage in the marketplace. This is undemocratic.

How can children learn to defend themselves unless they have to fight off
bullies on a daily basis?
 
Where else will they learn true US history and how the righteous North punished the ungodly South
in the "civil" war?
 
In order to learn how to cope in the real world, they must be totally immersed in ungodliness
and gutter language at an early, impressionable age.

Ridicule from other children is important to the socialization process.

Children in public schools can get more practice "Just Saying No" to drugs,
cigarettes and alcohol.
 
It is the best option for becoming culturally sensitized in the areas of racism, homophobia,
and gender discrimination,  not to mention being taught the true "facts" of our founding fathers
 
Publicly asking permission to go to the bathroom teaches young people their
place in society.

The fashion industry depends upon the peer pressure that only public schools
can generate.

Public schools foster cultural literacy, passing on important traditions
like the singing of "Jingle Bells, Batman smells, Robin laid an egg..."

Home-schooled children may not learn important office career skills, like
how to sit still for six hours straight.

~Author Unknown

Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).  
                                   

March 5, 2007 Mini Edition by Joseph Harris Number 191

Moses was High All Right ....On the Mountain

In case you haven't heard, Moses was on drugs. Yep, he was just some whacked out old man hallucinating about the burning bush and about God on Mt. Sinai, because of partaking of the bark of the acacia tree. Before you think I am speaking tongue-in-cheek, these are serious allegations from a psychology professor at Hebrew University in Jerusalem. This professor also claimed that the Israelites used mind altering substances as a basic part of their worship. After reading these claims and other outrageous musings from Breitbart.com, I noticed a glaring absence in the professor's statements: PROOF. No biblical, archaeological or historical proof was ever mentioned in the article. Here are some exact words or phrases found in the article: (1) "Israeli researcher claimed" (2) "a professor...wrote" (3) "very probable" (4) "was probably" . There was, however, one emphatic, statement made, by the "researcher", concerning himself: he has "dabbled" with drugs. Hey, that's where I prefer to get my historical bible truths: from a psychology professor who is also a self professed drug user.

He does give one tidbit of "proof" as to the drug use of Moses and Israel by referring to some obscure and irrelevant example about some modern day tribe in the Amazon that uses drugs in religious ceremonies. He never bothers to close the cultural, linguistic, geographical and time gap between the Old Testament Israelites and the modern day Amazons. He then recounts his own spiritually based religious visions while on a similar drug used by the Amazons which, once again, must be proof positive that Moses did drugs. This professor must be a Democrat or the Israeli equivalent, since no one in the media has bothered to call his hand on his obvious lack of proof. You know the old liberal media philosophy: if it slams God or Bible truth, then it must be true, and don't you dare question it. This discovery was considered "news" and most internet search engines will give several references to this discovery.

This is great news for fornicators, adulterers, liars, thieves and all other commandment breakers. If Moses was just some dope head, then the ten commandments would naturally be the ravings of his wild and drug influenced imagination and therefore, not authoritative (the truth is, God authored the ten commandments, not Moses).

The woods are full of doubters, skeptics and atheists. They never seem to tire of attacking God and the Bible, but I get weary when their opinions are treated as gospel truth with no challenge.

Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear).

 
November 29, 2007                 Mini Edition by Joseph Harris               Number 189 
 
         A Thermostat or a Thermometer?
 
In almost every modern home, there is a little box on some wall called a thermostat.  It controls the climate in the house.  Also contained in the box is a thermometer, which measures the temperature inside the house.  The thermostat responds to the temperature of the thermometer, based on its setting.  One measures, one makes a difference. 
 
As a Christian, are you a thermostat or a thermometer?  A lot of Christians are nothing more than a thermometer.  They take on the temperature of their environment.  At church, they are holy, kind, patient and considerate.  Away from the church crowd, they are rude, crude, impatient and act like their worldly environment.  They do nothing more than reflect and emulate their environment. 
 
Thermostat Christians make a change in the temperature of their environment.  When backbiting begins, they refrain and instead use edifying words.  When confronted in anger, they answer softly and  not in wrath for "The wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God", according to Brother James.  They are not affected by the cold or the heat.  They walk to the beat of the Holy Spirit,  since they are filled with Him and they make a difference in their environment.
 
When Peter stood by the fire warming himself, as Jesus was being tried illegally, he took on the climate of the world.  When confronted with his identity and association with Jesus, he lied, then swore.  Peter reflected the temperature of the world.  He was a thermometer.
 
When Demas forsook Paul and loved this present world, he was a thermometer and of no use to Paul or God.
 
The Macedonian believers, however, became a thermostat and made a difference and along with Paul, became "ensamples to all that believe in Macedonia and Achaia" (I Thess. 1:7) and they also became a thermometer as they took on the climate of Paul and God, "And ye became followers of us, and of the Lord..." (I Thess. 1:6). 
 
Three well known thermostats in the Bible were the Hebrews in Daniel who would not bow to the king.  When everyone else was doing it, they absolutely refused to bow to a man made image.  They were so locked in to God that they vowed to not bow whether,  God preserved them or not.  The issue for them was not deliverance, but integrity.
 
Oh God give us some thermostat Christians who will stop reflecting the temperature of this world and its filth, and who are more concerned about pleasing the Holy God of the universe, as they set the temperature of Godliness in their family, church, work place and community. 
 
 
November 20, 2007                 Mini Edition by Joseph Harris               Number 188      
                        
                                                                                            
                 Illegal Immigrant TV Spinoff Shows
                                                                      
Spinoffs of popular TV shows have been common over the years.  Some of the first and most popular spinoffs came from creator/producer Paul Henning, beginning with such great shows as The Beverly Hillbillies, followed by its spinoff of Petticoat Junction, finally followed by Green Acres.  Well, I have some spinoffs from old and new popular shows, with a theme: Illegal Immigrant Spinoffs.  When my creative mind starts turning, stuff usually comes pretty fast.  This is how all the junk you get in email gets started on the internet (Remember my Muslim Southern Gospel Quartet, The Jihad Boys), but also remember this: you got in on the ground floor with this one, cause they are straight from my hot little brain. 
 
 
Three's Company with the spinoff Thirty's Company.  A story about 30 illegals living in one rent house in shifts.
 
Chico and the Man, followed by Chico and the man, and the woman, and the children, and the grandparents, and the cousins and.....A show about one extended family's realized dream to come to the USA.
 
Dora the Explorer with the spinoff, Dora the Border Explorer.  Children's show about a little Hispanic girl who finds new and exciting ways to cross the border.
 
Go Diego, Go with the spinoff, Go Back Diego, Go Back.  Diego is Dora's cousin who apparently has also explored along the border.
 
8 is Enough.  This spinoff is called 8 Million is Enough, showing how even 8 million illegals will drastically affect the US economy, notwithstanding the 12 million already here.
 
Mr. Roger's Neighborhood spinoff is called Senor Roger's Newly Repopulated and Diverse Neighborhood.  A minority of American citizens find themselves the only English speaking people in their neighborhood.
 
Law and Order has a spinoff called No Law and Disorder, a show about how immigration laws are not enforced and the consequences that follow.
 
LA Law.  This spinoff, LA Immigration Law, is a daring, cutting edge program about a law firm that dares to prosecute illegals in, of all places, Los Angeles.  Caution, graphic violence involved.
 
For those who get offended, get a life and a sense of humor.  The truth is the truth and illegals are illegal and no amount of spin can change the  truth.  We can either accept the truth or reject it, but we can not change it. 
 
Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS.(This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear)  
 
  November 16, 2007                 Mini Edition by Joseph Harris               Number 187      
                                                        
                         WE’VE COME A LONG WAY, BABY!

According to officials in Montgomery County in Maryland, individuals can now choose their gender (Worldnetdaily.com, November 14, 2007).  If you as a male, "feel" or "perceive" you are female, you are.  Same thing for females who think they are males.  This will certainly save a lot of money on "gender reassignment" surgeries, if you want to overlook one small fact: it's absolutley insane.  Sane thinking people are concerned about people of the opposite sex using the same public facilites as the oppostie sex, such as restrooms, showers, locker rooms, etc. and their proposed law would allow this, even though the officials deny it. 

Think of the possibilities.  If anyone wants to change their race, just use the power of the mind and presto, it's done.  Whites can be black, Blacks can become Asian, and so on.  Never mind some absoutes that were established at birth.  Absolutes are no longer absolutes.  What you think, perceive and feel is now the standard for reality.  I wonder if I can convince my bank that I really have a balance in my checking account of $300,000.00?  If this is my perception, then the bank will just have to accept it and validate all the checks I write, because I believe I have $300,000.00 in my account.  Don't argue with my reality.

On a related issue, I am reminded of a story I read a few years back.  The University of California in Los Angeles has long been known as a hotbed of liberalism, especially evident in the 60's. It’s no surprise that feminism is strongly supported and taught at UCLA. What’s surprising is the presence of a campus group known as the Independent Women’s Forum, a conservative organization. The IWF claims to be a counter-organization of the NOW, National Organization for Women, or as I fondly refer to them, the National Organization of Whiners.

We are often cautioned against placing a stereotype on individuals or groups, but it’s kinda hard not to with liberals. They are so predictable. One stereotype of a liberal group is this: THEY can downgrade, denigrate and devil anyone they choose, but let just ONE word be said in opposition against them or their ideology, and they cry incessantly like the thin-skinned babies they are. It’s true almost every time; the great "preachers" of tolerance suddenly become extremely intolerant when they are on the receiving end of criticism. So if the stereotype fits . . . well, you know the rest.

The Independent Women's Forum ran an advertisement in the student paper challenging what they called "The Ten Most Common Feminist Myths" and the outcry began. The feminists cried "hateful" and "damaging to the UCLA community" for starters. Now, all the IWF did was tell the truth with hard facts and statistics about some of the following feminist myths: (1) One out of every four girls experiences rape or attempted rape by a male on college campuses; (2) Girls don’t receive as well an education as boys; (3) Gender is a social construction, . . . and so on.

Now, the IWF did say the feminist professors at UCLA were "factually challenged" and were "male bashers," but hey, the truth usually hurts. Someone needs to say it. Groups like the National Organization for Women have for too long had free reign given to them by the major liberal news media outlets and it’s refreshing to hear someone tell the truth. Liberal groups have been unchallenged for so long, they just can’t handle it when they are confronted with truth. Unfortunately, most have been inoculated to the truth by their own self deception.

What saith the Lord concerning male and female? The man was first formed, then the woman, Paul said, and the order of creation establishes the authority of the man. Concerning sin, the man was in the transgression, but the woman was deceived, therefore it was "by one man sin entered into the world", not one woman, according to Romans 5.  Paul also stated that a woman was not to usurp the God-given authority of the male.  There has been a rash of women "preachers" over the past few decades, but scripture is plain on this issue, for those who will accept truth and not be guided by feelings and emotion. 

Ladies and Gentlemen, males and females are different. They have different roles, different positions in the home, and different areas of ministry. They are just as different emotionally as they are physically. Women have no place in the foxhole and men just can’t nurture like women can.  And no one can change their gender by wishing, hoping or having surgery.  God does not make mistakes and He does not place a male in a female body or visa versa. 

Departure from the Word of God can only lead to switched roles and confused, unfulfilled men, women, and children. Hey, I have a novel idea! How about we try it God’s way for the next generation? We’ve come a long way baby. Now let’s shift into reverse.

  
  Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS.(This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear)                                    

Check out my latest product, Southern Charm Drinking Chocolate, by clicking on the cup, and request a free sample.

September 28, 2007                 Mini Edition by Joseph Harris               Number 185      
                        
  Stepping on Snakes
 
     I have never stepped on a snake, but have come close a couple of times.  I have actually had something worse happen to me. One night, I went into an empty house we owned, checking it out because of recent robberies in the area.  When trying to close the back door after entering, I noticed the door would not close all the way.  I had been having trouble with the striker plate on the door and thought it just needed an extra push.  I pushed and shoved and the door still would not close.  Irritated, I yanked the door open to see if the head of a screw was sticking out.  I immediately found what was keeping the door from closing.  As the door flew open, a four foot rat snake fell down on my head.  He had been wedged at the top, in between the door and the casing, keeping the door from closing.  As he fell down on my head and slid down my face and on to my arms, I yelled and jumped backwards several feet in one leap.  That's a pretty good feat,  when you weigh 240 pounds and stand at 5'9.  I had a pistol on me, but by the time I got it out and ready, the snake was gone and I wouldn't have been able to hit him anyway.  That was too close to a snake, for me. 
     Would you rather err on the side of righteousness or unrighteousness?  Would you rather get close to a snake or remain at a distance?  Christian liberty may say, "I can do it, I have a right, it's allowed", but Christian maturity says, "For me to live is Christ and I love God and want to protect my testimony."  It has always amazed me at the length to which people will go to get near sin, but won't even begin to pay the price to get near God.  If you are more interested in getting closer to sin than in getting closer to God, something is wrong.  Getting near a snake doesn't guarantee you will be bitten, but it increases your chances. 
     I am concerned when Christians spend more time looking for loopholes that allow them freedom to indulge in, or partake of, or associate with that which is questionable for Christians.  It is an indictment that they are more focused on themselves than on God.  Plus, there is always potential danger, for sin can bite like a snake. 
    I spoke at a church this past Summer and was grieved at what I saw.  There were several women there who were not dressed modestly.  These were decent and attractive women.  We sometimes use the phrase "good looking".  It was more than that.  These were nice looking women who were "hot",  to use a description of today.  Their attire, which was skimpy and tight,  made them hot.  If their dress had been decent and modest, the word "hot" would not be appropriate and they would have just been nice looking, Godly women.  I am not judging their character, because they were probably moral women, but it was difficult to see Godliness with so much skin showing.  People who know me will say, "Well there he goes again, harping on dress, when there are more important things."  There certainly are more important things, but dress and appearance also have a place of importance.  Loophole seekers are always turning attention away to "more important" things.  And even if I DO harp on certain things, it's usually because everyone else's harp is broken, and they are silent on certain issues.  There is a direct connection between immodest dress and inflamed lust and increased sexual desire in today's society.  There is also a direct connection between going into the woods or to a lake and finding a snake.  Going where snakes live increases the chance of finding and even stepping on snakes.  Staying away from snake habitations decreases the possibility of seeing and stepping on snakes.
     Hungering and thirsting after God, with a desire to please Him decreases opportunities to sin and dishonor Him.  WHY are Christians so concerned with this world, it's styles and fashions, programs and all it has to offer when they could feast on the things of God and the genuine peace, joy and fulfillment that comes only from dedication  to Him?
     Legalist?  Legalism?  The word has to do with adhering to law.  I'll take law any day over lawlessness.  And watch out for snakes.
  Joseph Harris is the Chairman of Biblical Studies at Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS.(This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear)  
                                   
 
September, 2007  Mini Edition by Joseph Harris  Number 184      
                        
                                    Family Values   
 
     Have you ever had a tempting offer that seemed too good to be true?  One example that comes to mind would be the work at home ads that promise you will make $10,000 the first month and as much as you want after that.  The old saying of "If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is" is an axiom of truth.  
      Last year, I received a offer that could have been a lucrative deal, if only that pesky Christianity stuff had not gotten in the way.  The casting producer for a show on ABC contacted me about being on their program.  She said it was a hit show on ABC's Disney family hour.  Since I do not watch much TV, and never watch regular network programming, I had never heard of the show, but everyone I asked had heard of the show.  The casting producer was looking for an illusionist and his family, and came across my web site.  The appearance on the show, and the filming, which would take a couple of weeks of my life, would pay $20,000.00.  I admit, this amount caused me to raise an eyebrow, but if my family and I had appeared on the program, it would have been the end of my ministry.  The potential to corrupt my children was assured, because of the nature of the program.  I declined and asked a few friends if they were interested, but that was before I found out how corrupt the show was, otherwise, I would have thought twice about asking them.  I still have not watched an episode of the show and do not plan on it. 
     The offer came soon after asking God for some extra income for a specific matter.  AND it was on ABC's DISNEY FAMILY hour.  I was assured it was a family show.  Surely, this was God answering prayer.  I learned long ago that the world doesn't have a clue, when it comes to real family values.  I remember renting a cartoon film from a video store when my daughter was young, and asking the clerk about the film.  She assured me it was a clean, child friendly, wonderful animation.  Five minutes into the film, curse words began.  I turned it off, took the film back and, with charity, told the employee the film was not a children's film. (This was not a Disney film, but Disney dropped the ball long ago concerning family values) 
     But back to the "family" show.  Just because a show is centered around a family or families, this doesn't mean it is fit for family consumption.  After checking into the situation, it appeared they wanted a Christian family, but I suspect it was for the opportunity to mock Christianity and challenge real family values.  Even though I was encouraged by some to consider it, it was never a possibility from the beginning.
     The importance of a stable, Godly family cannot be overstated.  No single institution has been attacked as vehemently and viciously, as the family has been attacked.  The emasculation of the male, blurring of the roles of the sexes, and laxation of the discipline of children, have all weakened the family in the last 100 years.   Family values begin with placing value on God as the foundation of the family, led by the Father and supported by the Mother.  Discipline and standards, motivated by love, will establish the children in habits, manners and a Christian world view philosophy of life that glorifies God, strengthens churches and produces good citizens.  Parents have only one shot with their children.  That's why it's so important to guard them from that which would steal their innocence and purity.                              
  Joseph Harris is the Chairman of Biblical Studies at Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear)  
  
 
August 24, 2007   Mini Edition by Joseph Harris   Number 183      
                                                                                                    
                             Modeling the Love of Christ
 
     An old song from 1965, written by Burt Bacharach and Hal David and performed by Jackie De Shannon, has lyrics that state, "What the world needs now is love, sweet love, no not just for some, but for everyone..."  The song was popular and contains a lot of truth.  The whole truth is, the love that is needed is the love of God.  Love is always powerful, but the strongest force in the universe is the love of God.  It will reach down, heal, overcome, and  empower to the fullest, in every situation.  The best preaching, witnessing, singing, etc. in the world misses it mark, if not fueled by the love of God.  In service and ministry for Christ, it is the love of God overflowing in our hearts that motivates us or as Paul puts it, "...the love of Christ constraineth us..."  II Cor. 5:14.         
     Love cannot just be preached about or spoken of: it must be seen.  Imagine if God had only TOLD us that He loved us, instead of SHOWING it.  Empty words would not save us.  God backed up his words by sending Jesus to die for us, thereby proving His love.  "But God commendeth his love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us."  Romans 5:8.  God then raised Jesus from the dead, completing the plan of salvation, sealing it and justifying us by the empty tomb. 
     Seeing the love of God in Christians profoundly influenced me in my early Christianity.  When yet lost, I was deeply influenced by a Godly woman, Mrs. Ann Lombardo, from New Orleans, Louisiana.  I was a lost heathen living in Bay St. Louis in 1980 when I first met her.  She would come to the Bay St. Louis/Waveland area and stay in a weekend home several times each year.  When she walked into my place of business, I knew something was different.  As I assisted her (I was a shoe salesman) she asked me if I knew Jesus Christ as Savior.  I fumbled out some answer about being saved, then she said, "Oh that's so good.  Isn't He a wonderful Savior?"  I mumbled something back and got away from her.  The love of God in this born again former Catholic was overpowering.    
     The next weekend, she was back.  Surely she did not need more shoes.   Actually, she had targeted me and was back to talk about Jesus again.  Though she had already asked if I was saved, she asked again....and again.....and again, because she knew I didn't have a clue about salvation, even though I professed to be saved.  She was a great customer and I sold many pairs of shoes, but the love was so real and conviction of God was so strong, I actually dodged her when I could.  Her words haunted me: "Isn't He a wonderful Savior?"  She was the only complete stranger in my life who had ever asked me if I was saved.  A few months later, I did find out that HE'S A WONDERFUL SAVIOR!
     I went off to Bible college for one year at Southeastern Baptist College and the next year returned to Bay St. Louis as a summer missionary, assisting Brother Thelbert Hill, missionary pastor of Central Baptist Church.   Guess who walked into church one Wednesday evening?  Mrs. Ann Lombardo.  She introduced me to a friend who was staying with her for a couple of months, Mrs. Minnie Jester.  She loved working with children and was known to kids by her nickname, Miss Boots.  These two ladies had a passion for souls and especially for children.  They invited me to help in a backyard Bible school at Mrs. Lombardo's summer home.  I packed every kid I could find into my car every morning the next week  and watched these two ladies teach Bible and LOVE those kids, most of whom were thrown away and neglected by their parents.    Miss Boots talked to those kids with finger puppets, served them drink and cookies and hugged their dirty little bodies.  
     I did not realize at the time how much these ladies influenced me as Jesus radiated through them.  SEEING the love of God in them strengthened me then and later, and even now as I recount these memories.  I do not know where they are today or if they are still alive.  I never knew much personally about either, except that Ann Lombardo lived in New Orleans and Minnie Jester, in her younger days, had been the personal secretary to J. Edgar Hoover.  What I do know is that they kept the first and second great commandments and loved the Lord their God with all their heart and soul and mind and each loved her neighbor as much as herself.  God bless you ladies.  Thank you for showing  Jesus to me.                     
  Joseph Harris is the Chairman of Biblical Studies at Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear)  
  
                                 
August 3, 2007 Mini Edition by Joseph Harris               Reprint      
                   
 YOUR SUPREME COURT AND CHILD PORNOGRAPHY

I have never understood the decision of the Supreme Court to protect virtual child porn as free speech. In a decision that had to do with invalidating portions of the Child Pornography Act which was passed by Congress in 1996, the court basically said that REAL photographs of REAL children involved in REAL sexual acts are illegal and not protected as free speech, BUT computer generated images that APPEAR to be of children, which APPEAR to be involved in sex acts are okay. In other words, hand drawn or computer generated pictures that appear to be of minors in acts of simulated sex, are protected as free speech. 

Well, that sounds as clear as the tax code. Only two judges dissented. Hats off to Justices Antonin Scalia and William Rehnquist. Apparently, only two judges on the highest court in this country are thinking with any sanity and common sense. Imagine, if it has not hit you yet; the highest court in this land believes that virtual child pornography has merit and needs protecting.

One charge by opponents was that predators can use this now legal porn to entice and lure children into the real thing, which is exactly what they do with all kinds of porn. Now the predators can show legal pictures of children supposedly engaged in sexual acts, to real children, to entice them and further break down barriers of inhibition. In response to this charge, Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote for the majority, said that candy and video games can also be used for immoral purposes, but are not prohibited just because they have potential for misuse. IS HE SERIOUS? This is the worst case of comparing apples with oranges I have ever seen. Child porn compared with candy? Is anyone out there with me, or am I the only one wondering what this guy is doing on the bench, with that kind of reasoning.

Let’s follow through with their reasoning of the pictures not being real and the sexual acts only simulated. How would they respond to:

Hate Crimes - pictures of homos being beaten or lynched, simulated of course and computer imaged. No actual pictures of real people.

Minority Bashing - handrawn, naturally, featuring minorities being trashed and abused by hand drawn skin-heads and “good ole boys” (with virtual tobacco spit stains)

Animal Abuse-Lab rats being mercilessly tortured and maimed, just pretend, of course, with only simulated torture of computer generated images, complete with fake cries for help.

I wonder if today’s judges and courts would fight for free speech protection of the above mentioned proposals. Why not? After all, it’s only simulation.

Our high court should be concerned with protecting children, but instead has sided with those who would hurt, misuse and abuse our children. Remember the words of Jesus. It would be better to have a millstone tied around your neck and drowned than to hurt innocent children. God help us.

 

July 13, 2007 Mini Edition by Joseph Harris       Number 182      
                                                                            
                     WITHOUT NATURAL AFFECTION

An accurate description of society today can be found in II Timothy 3:1-5. This description is not some abstract of an unknown people in an unknown time. I believe it accurately and prophetically describes the time in which we live today. Who can argue with such words and phrases describing men as “lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers” and this is only a partial list. Every one of these “qualities” can be found daily from a compilation of newspapers. 

One phrase that stands out as especially true and descriptive is “without natural affection.” The word natural is derived from the word nature which has to do with “the inherent or essential qualities of anything,” to give a dictionary definition. To have affection for someone means to cherish that person. The

phrase is also found in Romans 1 with reference to homosexuals who are without natural affection for the opposite sex. Having natural affection is the norm, as in a male having natural affection for a female, a female having natural affection for a male, and a parent having a natural affection for his or her children. In other words, it’s just the natural thing, or that which is expected and normal.

Though the Bible never mentions the word abortion, it does speak of murder and shedding of innocent blood. The phrase “without natural affection” in I Timothy 3:3 can also describe the feeling of a mother toward a child she may want aborted. In the animal kingdom, most mothers have an intense desire to protect their young, to the point of the mother putting her own life on the line. With animals, this is called instinct. The mother doesn’t think about it or have to be taught to protect her young. She just does it, therefore it is natural.

All human mothers have a God-given desire to protect their young, whether inside or outside the womb. To dislike, even hate a child to the point of murdering the child, is to be without natural affection. But God places a natural affection within the heart of every parent. The same can be said of any father who might abuse or kill his children. He is without natural affection. Simply put, it is natural for him to love and protect his children, and unnatural to hate and abuse them. The result of any mother who rejects or denies this God-given natural affection is guilt and frustration, which explains why so many mothers who have had their children killed, eventually need some kind of emotional or psychological counseling. They also need forgiveness from God for committing the sin of murder.

As we “celebrate” decades of killing the innocent and helpless, may God have mercy on America and raise the consciousness level of this current generation concerning the horrible holocaust that has been taking place in the name of choice, because of the lack of natural affection.

  Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear)  
 
 
June 22, 2007   Mini Edition by Joseph Harris           Number 180      
                        
     Revolt or Revival?

The revolt has arrived! The coup has come! The truth is finally beginning to come out. After YEARS of enduring a liberal dominated media (and government), the winds of change have blown in like a hurricane. Conservative talk radio continues to grow by leaps and bounds and this phenomenon has even filtered down to television via the Fox News Network (I know they are not as fair and balanced as they think, but it's a start).  Reasonable, sane, common sense minded, conservative Americans have had enough.

We the people are tired of being told what to think and what we should tolerate, condone and endorse. We are tired of seeing Christianity bashed, God blasphemed, perversion praised, and prayer and religion expelled from public and government life. We are fed up with Greenpeace, animal rights and all manner of environmental wackism. We are disgusted with so called racism, “inequality” of rights and multi-culturalism. We are sick of government programs funded by over taxation that reward the lazy and immoral and perpetuate misery, ignorance and crime. We have simply had it with crooked politicians who refuse to accurately represent their constituents, but pander to lobbyists while padding their pockets. We want the ACLU, NEA, NOW and every other liberal, God-hating, freedom destroying group to back off and realize they DO NOT speak for the backbone of this country, but represent a liberal fringe minority. We are at the end of our patience with appointed judges who rewrite the Constitution, then shove their distorted interpretation down the collective American throat, through the “omnipotent power” of their federal bench. We are going broke paying through the nose to support a government education program in public schools, that falls more behind each year, educates few, disciplines none, and frustrates the majority.

Talk radio has led this revolution in the electronic media. Many are the voices and pundits crying aloud day and night. Each is a voice crying in the wilderness and their success is due to the fact that there is an audience for their message.

But let’s not lose focus of this hard truth which is bittersweet news. Their message is refreshing for the political conservative, but morally and spiritually, there is a void. The conservative Bible believer realizes this hard truth. There is no real national conservative, Bible-believing voice (Biblically known as a prophet) that hits at the crux of the problem, giving the real solution. Conservatism as a philosophy can only go so far and only do so much. Morality can contribute to the solution, but is not the solution (hey, even lost people can be moral). The real solution is the Gospel of Jesus Christ, preached and lived by God-called preachers in true New Testament churches, backed up by church members who are born again believers. Soul winning, intercessory prayer and holy living will do more to change culture, affect society, empty prisons, close abortion clinics, shut down dope dealers, transform homosexuals, clean up government and kill pornography than any other one thing or combination of things.

The conservative revolt has been welcome and refreshing, true enough, but are we as true Bible believers willing to lay hold on the real solution as just described? Probably not, because it will cost. Jesus never said following Him would be easy. He likened it to taking up a cross and dying. The solution requires believers to die to self, die to the world, and live for God. Until we are willing to pay the full price, do not expect any real changes.

Here is the answer: “If my people which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear from Heaven and heal their land.” II Chronicles 7:14. You are either playing or praying. Which is it? Work for the night is coming.

 

 Things You Cannot Say In America 

Have you ever known anyone with a martyr’s complex, who enjoyed persecution and actually felt worthless in life unless they were being maligned? These hapless individuals even manufacture persecution during slow seasons. Now if you happen to be one of these individuals, or would like to be persecuted, boiled in oil, flayed alive and then beheaded, this article is for you.

In the Kingdom of Political Correctness, some things are just no-no. Truth, honesty and facts are nowhere to be found in this land of make-believe. Expediency, self promotion and personal enrichment are usually the motivations for being PC. Purveyors of PC lie, dodge and twist the truth, re-phrasing sentences and re-defining well established definitions in order to change thinking on issues. Residents in this fairy tale kingdom can be found in government positions, universities and colleges, pulpits, schools, and any place of influence. They eat at the foundation of absolute truth, especially as found in Scripture and shoot their venom at all who oppose and expose their insidious ways. They have succeeded in silencing many who might otherwise speak the truth in boldness, having beaten them down to believe that “fairness” and “compassion” are paramount and must reign as the standard used to judge what is spoken or printed.

To ensure you end up thrown into the torture dungeon of the Kingdom of Political Correctness, you might begin by spouting off at the mouth with some phrases that have to do with gender roles and sexual identity. These subjects will ensure your place on the stretching rack. To get you started, here are some things you cannot say in America:

‘Men and women are different”

“Homosexuality is a sin”

“Islam is not a religion of peace, but produces terrorists”

“Jesus” (spoken while leading in a public prayer)

“Mothers should stay at home and make motherhood their career”

“The Republican Party has betrayed conservatives”

“Illegal Aliens” (instead of undocumented immigrants)

“The South was right” (States rights trump federal legislation anyday)

“The Catholic institution persecuted Bible believers throughout church history”

“Palestinian gunmen are murdering terrorists, not freedom fighters”

“George Bush has betrayed America with his amnesty policy for illegals”

“Home educated students excel above traditional students”

“Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are racists”

“The Constitution is not a living document”

So there you have it. Things to say, just for starters, that are sure to bring reproach in today’s multi-cultural, pluralistic, God-hating, Christ-denying society. See you in the dungeon.

“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” Isaiah 5:20

  Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear)  
 
 
June 8, 2007  Mini Edition by Joseph Harris            Number  178                                                                                                    Absolute Absolutes, Absolutely
 
      The law is authority and law is based on authority.  Where does authority begin.  It must have a source.  There are basically two views, which as you might guess, contradict one another.  (1) Authority is derived from man, as groups collectively bestow power upon government or magistrates, to govern the people.  (2) Authority is derived from God, then man organizes government, based upon the commandments and principles of God.  If authority comes from man, then there are no absolutes.  What man deems to be wrong, is indeed wrong, as long as man declares it to be wrong.  Man may then change the law and what was wrong is then, no longer wrong.  However, if God declares something to be wrong, then an absolute absolute is established, which is immutable.
     Thomas Hobbes, 1588-1679, was a British philosopher and infidel, who advocated that authority is derived from man under the common consent of the governed.  If authority comes from man, then nothing is moral or immoral, but amoral.  The phrase "inalienable rights" from the Declaration of Independence, speaks of authority that transcends man.  They are also sometimes called natural rights.  "Inalienable" means they are fixed and not contingent on or awarded by human power.  The right to life is an unalienable power.  According to English philosopher, John Locke, who was diametrically opposed to the philosophy of Thomas Hobbes, the main fundamental rights were the right to "life, liberty and estate", estate being the right to own property. 
     Are not all three of these challenged increasingly in today's world?  The right to life was challenged and blown away years ago, when the right to murder innocent, unborn children in the womb was legalized.  Our liberties are under fire as an ever growing government continues to encroach on "we the people" with insane rulings from agenda driven judges, from the right to own firearms to the right to disagree with and voice an opinion against that which is perverse and abnormal, in the realm of what defines a family.  And certainly, the right to own property is challenged through eminent domain cases, with an increase in abuse, as a philosophy of socialism continues to grow among elected officials.  By it's own admission, the Federal Government owns more than 600,000,000 acres of land and it increases every year.  Woven into the fabric of the institution of this nation, was the desire of the right to own property.
     A prevailing theme throughout the Bible is the theme of authority.  Whether the story is the garden of Eden, Israel in Egypt or the promised land, the united or divided kingdom, Jesus in the Gospels, or the presentation of the King of Kings in the book of Revelation, authority is the final issue.  Will man rebel against God, or will man submit to God?  That is always the final issue.  Either God is the absolute authority of the universe, to which all men are accountable, or He is not.  If He is not the final authority, then nothing matters, man can live as he chooses and die, entering into nothing with no reward or punishment.  Or man can submit to God, through repentance and faith in the blood of Jesus, live for Him, fearing Him and keeping His commandments, thereby entering into the joy of his Lord at death. 
     You know, if I'm wrong and atheists are right, then no one has to give account to a higher power.  But If I'm right................. You tell me the best common sense choice. 
  Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear)  

                                 
 

May 25, 2007  Mini Edition by Joseph Harris    Number 177                                                                                                        
 
Pirates Rights
 
     We hear so much today about rights.  I want my rights.  He wants his rights.  They want their rights.  Everybody wants what's coming to them.  These "rights snatchers" have several things in common.  Their most distinctive common thread is thin skin.  They are easily offended.  “Great peace have they which love thy law: and nothing shall offend them.” Psalm 119:165. 
     ILLEGAL ALIENS from Mexico, are the new up and coming minority and heart throb of the news media.  They want their rights too.  But it's not like their basic human rights in this country are being violated.  They have the right to life, among other things.  No ILLEGAL ALIEN can be indiscriminately killed at the whim of any legal citizen.  The rub comes in when they claim, as a right, something that  should be an earned  privilege for legal citizens, such as government benefits, or the legal right to drive a vehicle, or constitutional rights, etc., which SHOULD BE RESERVED FOR LAW ABIDING CITIZENS.  Where, oh where, is common sense?
     First, they are breaking the immigration laws of this country by arriving and remaining here illegally.  Regardless of their reason for coming, the issue of legality must remain paramount.   If the debate gets sidetracked as to why they came here, or that they have family here,  then emotion begins to rule and feelings dictate how they must be dealt with.  When laws are not enforced, then authority is destroyed, and when there is no authority, situational ethics become the authority, which means laws are written in Jello.  And our immigration laws are as firm as lemon Jello.  Notice, the color of lemon is yellow.
     So not only are ILLEGAL ALIENS breaking the law, they are flaunting their criminality in arrogance, demanding to receive more than hard working, lifelong citizens, who have paid their dues, are receiving.  They also have the gall to be "offended" when called on the carpet.  Now, all the old guard career offendees, led by Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton,  have to battle just  to get in line and be heard, since more and more minorities are jockeying to be heard with their list of offenses.  Blacks are offended at the Confederate flag, Mexicans are offended because they are called ILLEGAL ALIENS, Muslims are offended because someone points out that terrorists are, coincidentally, Muslim, American Indians are mad because some sports team is named the Braves.  You get the picture. 
     I'm here to proclaim the rights of a downtrodden group who has never had a voice: pirates.  I'm not talking about the modern day sissy pirates who make and sell CD's and DVD's illegally.  They wouldn't last two seconds under Captain Hook.  I'm talking about swashbuckling, rope swinging, ship burning, booty stealing, brawling pirates.  Historically, I believe pirates have been misunderstood.  I know that pirates murder, commit pillage and rape, but they should be granted amnesty.  You have got to be compassionate and understand their background and condition.  After being cooped up on a ship with a bunch of smelly men, all walking around and saying "Arrrrrgh",  for months at a time, you would rape and plunder too.  Besides, who are you to deny someone of making a living? 
     How can anyone sit in judgment of pirates?  So they push the envelope legally.  They only do what they do to make a living.  Murder, stealing, and destroying property is a part of their job description.  It's what they do, not who they are.  I'm sure most pirates are decent, patriotic, God fearing, family loving, hard working (you ever tried loading a cannon ball into a cannon?) people who want to better themselves and contribute to this country. 
     Pirates have gotten a bad rap.  They are belittled in today's society.  Now days, no little boy wants to grow up and be a pirate.  They only want to play pirate in their childhood.  It is a slap in the face to name a ball team the Pirates, or Buccaneers.  Imagine the outrage if you heard of such teams as the Tacoma Terrorists, Minneapolis Muslims, Mighty Mexicans, or New York Negroes.  We would never hear the end of it.  But no one ever speaks up for the minority group of pirates when they are mocked and ridiculed.   
     If you are a pirate or descended from piratage, then you may consider joining the Council on American Pirate Relations, better known as C.A.P.R., for a fair representation.   And hurry!  The Mexicans are winning at the present.  For crime statistics on ILLEGAL ALIENS, go to www.familysecuritymatters.org.
  Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear)  

                                  To receive or discontinue Mini Edition, email joharris@comcast.net with ADD or REMOVE Forward this Edition to a Friend.

 
May 18, 2007  Mini Edition by Joseph Harris Number 176      
                                                         
TERRORISM BY ANY OTHER NAME IS STILL TERRORISM

ALF does not stand for an alien life form that is brown and furry.  An ELF is not a small creature with pointed ears who works for Santa. Can you guess what they are? Here’s another hint. ALF and ELF are responsible for illegal activities such as trespassing, arson, and fire bombings. ALF stands for Animal Liberation Front and ELF is the Earth Liberation front. They are both terrorist groups, according to an official definition given by the FBI.

These wacko nuts release animals that do not belong to them, from facilities such as testing laboratories and mink farms. They set fire to buildings and businesses, including restaurants that serve meat. They have even burned restaurants, such as McDonalds. These groups break the law and create mayhem in the name of compassion for mistreated animals and the abused earth, bringing deliverance from the exploitation of “evil” capitalists.

Their compassion is usually one sided and misplaced. A few years ago, I heard a representative from Greenpeace speak at Southern Mississippi University. Though they are not as destructive as ALF and ELF, they still have a misguided passion.  He literally cried about how the baby seals in Alaska were being clubbed to death to provide furs for selfish humans. Actually, he would have protested whether the death was from clubbing, lethal injection, or old age. When asked about their position on abortion, he conveniently dodged the issue by stating that since abortion was such an emotional issue, Greenpeace had not adopted a position. Yet, emotions ran high over baby seals.  Conclusion? Animals are more important than humans.  Like I said, misguided compassion.

When illogical wackiness takes over, expect anything. I will not be surprised when I hear of a movement to stop killing plants, since they have life. Plants rights might be one effort I would support. I would never have to mow the lawn again, thereby sparing the lives of millions of baby blades of grass and all the microscopic life they support.  Hmmm.  This has possibilities. No more hedge trimming or tree pruning. Yard work would become extinct.  Of course, we could no longer then eat vegetables. This would spare a lot of innocent squash, lettuce, and tomato blood. The result: we would all starve to death,  because all we could eat would be cardboard, Styrofoam, and air.  It would be worth it, because plants, animals, and the earth would be saved from the real villain, man. Oh happy ecology day!  Sounds logical,  if you are a misguided, bleeding heart, plant/animal/earth worshiping nut. On the other hand, if you want to come back to reality, read and believe Genesis 1:26-30, 9:1-3, and I Timothy 4:3-5.

Philosophies that are divorced from sound Bible doctrine and good common sense can breed violence and terrorism. Whether planting bombs, hijacking planes or burning buildings, no one has a right to disregard and violate the rights and property of others in the name of liberation, and that includes abortion clinic bombers.  Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear)  

 
May 10, 2007   Mini Edition by Joseph Harris  Number 175      
                                                                                                                                                                               Blind Watchmen and Dumb Dogs                                                                               
 
 Isaiah 56:10  "His watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping,  lying down, loving to slumber."
 
     I do not know if a better description can be found to fit the average Baptist preacher of today.  The Old Testament prophet was speaking of the lax prophets of his day, but his words apply to modern day church leaders who are asleep at the wheel, or to give a better ecclesiastical example, asleep in the pulpit. 
     A blind watchman sees no one and therefore, warns no one.  A watch dog that will not bark is nothing more than a biscuit eater.  He doesn't pull his own weight and is a danger to those who depend on  his faithful bark.  The modern day professional preacher is willfully blind and purposefully silent, when it comes to warning of the dangers and consequences of sin.  In this age of enlightenment, we have arrived at the place where sin is no longer preached against.  Instead, Bible principles are taught, Bible studies are held, prophecy conferences are offered and social gatherings in churches are at an all time high. 
     The average Baptist preacher places a premium on being spiritually politically correct, non-judgmental, sensitive, purpose driven, and popular.  He shudders with horror that he could be seen as legalistic,  mean spirited, narrow minded, old fashioned and out of touch with the times, and especially out of touch with youth.  As a result, these preachers become blind watchmen and dumb dogs who facilitate the destruction of their sheep as they plunge headlong down the slippery slope of the world with it's philosophies, standards, dress code, attitude, and actions. 
     Baptist preachers as a rule, no longer preach against drinking.  I know all the arguments that can be given for taking just one drink, but not getting drunk, but why would you want to get near a rattlesnake?  And even if Dad can "handle" it, can Jr. handle it when he grows up?  Remember the church covenant.  I just read about a wedding reception of some prominent Baptists in our town.  The write up in the paper recounted how they celebrated at the wedding reception with dancing, wine and beer.  How blatant.  God help their preacher to grow a backbone and love his people by warning them of this serpent in a bottle.
     Baptist preachers hardly ever preach against sexual immorality and homosexuality and pornography.  Churches are full of immorality in the pew and broken homes attest to this fact.  I have been told that it doesn't matter if the preacher preaches against it or not, people will do what they want to do regardless.  That is true to a certain extent, but there is a direct correlation between silent pulpits and the increase of ungodliness in churches and society.
     Baptist preachers won't usually dare touch the issue of dress and appearance.  Just who does the preacher think he is, telling people what to wear and not to wear.  I'll tell you who he is.  He is the man of God who watches for the souls of his people (Hebrews 13:17)  and he has every right to condemn nakedness, and tight clothing that reveals the body and fires the sexual imagination and blurs the line of demarcation between the sexes.  Make no provision for the flesh, and don't flaunt the flesh either.   
     Baptist preachers won't preach against tattoos, body piercings on men and women and earrings on men, because they want to "reach" them.  Reach them with what?  You do not have to look like the world to reach the world.  When Paul said he bore in his "body the marks of the Lord Jesus" (Gal. 6:17), he wasn't speaking of a tattoo of Jesus.  I understand that it is through the preaching of the Gospel that men are saved, but there is never a teaching of separation that follows the preaching of the Gospel to those who have been saved.  Jesus said to preach the gospel to every creature (evangelism) and Paul said to preach the word (to those who have been evangelized), reprove, rebuke and exhort with all long suffering.  It is not an either/or situation.  We are to preach the gospel and preach the whole counsel of God, which includes reproving, rebuking and exhorting. 
     I was once told, as a young preacher, to not preach against "things" but just preach the gospel and love people.  The preacher who gave me this advice didn't preach against sin and railed against those who did.  It was later found that during his ministry he had done just that: preached the gospel and loved people.  Actually, he loved many people, many women that is, to whom he was not married.  By the way, warning people of danger is loving them.
     Baptist preachers seldom preach about hell and eternal punishment of the lost in an eternal lake of fire.  Hell should never be preached without the cross of Calvary as the emphasis, but the cross is often preached with no mention of hell.  Why is there a need for the cross if there is no hell?
     Baptist preachers do not often preach on the authority structure of the home, with the husband as the head and the wife as the completer.  Parents are to be in charge of children, administering correction and discipline through love, training them to be submissive to parental authority in preparation for their submission to God in salvation. 
     Baptist preachers often fail to preach against ungodly entertainment via television and videos.  Christians should not watch others commit acts that are ungodly and which they themselves do not commit. Christians should not listen to others profane, mock, and blaspheme the name of God, especially when they themselves refrain from such wickedness.  Exposure to such filth de-sensitizes the believer to sin and it's consequences, breaking down barriers and inhibitions, weakening believers and preparing them for a fall. 
     Baptist preachers are hesitant to preach against corruption among politicians, afraid of offending those who vote for liberals based on party alone.  Right is right and wrong is wrong.  Just call it for what it is.
     Preaching against sin heightens awareness of right and wrong and re-establishes the standard of absolutes.  There is a God and a devil, a right and a wrong, a heaven and a hell, and everyone is going to one or the other.  Preaching standards of right or wrong help to remind there is a standard for which God's children are to live up to.  Specific, pointed preaching is effective.  Telling people they need to live a Christian life and please God only tells them what to do, without telling them how to do it.   If the Ten Commandments were written by man with today's understanding, they would be condensed to one statement,  "Thou shalt not do wrong."  Though the preceding statement is true, it doesn't say anything specific about sin.  I once heard a vague sermon against worldliness.  Worldliness was never defined, no examples were given, and no consequences were listed.  The preacher just said it was bad and we ought not to be worldly.  I left the sermon agreeing that worldliness is bad, but without a clue as to whether or not I was worldly.  
     In most cases where there is an emphasis on evangelism, there is no emphasis on instruction in righteousness for the newly saved.  The emphasis is to "reach" them by appealing to them or relating to them or understanding them.  After reaching them with salvation, we need to reach them with right living.  They are not to be conformed to this world  (Romans 12:2) but be conformed to the image of Christ (Romans 8:29).  To be conformed  means to be pressed into the mold of something, which means submission.  Modern Christianity places an emphasis on hanging on to your "rights", and fitting God into your life, instead of totally surrendering to God in submission to His will and standards.  When we don't preach separation from sin and the world for God's children, it undercuts the preaching of the Gospel and therefore affects the harvest long term,  for future generations. 
     We have a full generation in power today who have not heard the truth about sin,  and brother, it's evident in churches, politics, schools, families and the workplace.   May God be merciful to those preachers who are not living up to their calling to preach the word.
  Joseph Harris is the Vice President of Southeastern Baptist College in Laurel, MS. (This article may be reprinted in whole, as long as the name Joseph Harris and www.miniedition.net also appear)  

center>The Conservatice Voice - Dedicated to Faith, Family, Freedom.

Tell A Friend!
Type In Your Name:

Type In Your E-mail:

Your Friend's E-mail:

Your Comments:

Receive copy: 


Join the Ring
(This site in The Patriot Web Ring is owned by Joseph Harris)

Previous 10 Sites Previous Site Random Site List Sites Next Site Next 10 Sites 2 Chronicles 7:14 Join the Ring

Conservative
Conservative

Mississippi Baptist: Journal of the Baptist Missionary Association of Mississippi

The Fundamental Top 500